These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20883352)

  • 1. Effects of age and optical blur on real depth stereoacuity.
    Costa MF; Moreira SM; Hamer RD; Ventura DF
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Sep; 30(5):660-6. PubMed ID: 20883352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stereopsis and aging.
    Norman JF; Norman HF; Craft AE; Walton CL; Bartholomew AN; Burton CL; Wiesemann EY; Crabtree CE
    Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(23-24):2456-65. PubMed ID: 18771680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pooling signals from vertically and non-vertically orientation-tuned disparity mechanisms in human stereopsis.
    Patel SS; Bedell HE; Sampat P
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 16129469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of aging on stereoscopic interocular correlation.
    Laframboise S; De Guise D; Faubert J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):589-93. PubMed ID: 16909084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of age on adult stereoacuity as measured by different types of stereotest.
    Garnham L; Sloper JJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jan; 90(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 16361675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stereoscopic depth perception in peripheral field and global processing of horizontal disparity gradient pattern.
    Devisme C; Drobe B; Monot A; Droulez J
    Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(6):753-64. PubMed ID: 18249435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of interocular correlation and contrast on stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 18317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Binocular functional exploration: fundamental aspects and analysis by the Fusio-Test].
    Bourdy C; Cottin F; James Y
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1988; 11(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 3057057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of induced monocular blur on measures of stereoacuity.
    Odell NV; Hatt SR; Leske DA; Adams WE; Holmes JM
    J AAPOS; 2009 Apr; 13(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19071047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new method for assessing motion-in-depth perception in strabismic patients.
    Watanabe Y; Kezuka T; Harasawa K; Usui M; Yaguchi H; Shioiri S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 92(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 17596334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues.
    Harwerth RS; Moeller MC; Wensveen JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of Test Distance on Stereoacuity in Intermittent Exotropia.
    Seki Y; Wakayama A; Takahashi R; Umebara I; Tanabe F; Abe K; Shimomura Y
    Strabismus; 2017 Mar; 25(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 28156199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stereoacuity norms for school-age children using the Frisby stereotest.
    Anketell PM; Saunders KJ; Little JA
    J AAPOS; 2013 Dec; 17(6):582-7. PubMed ID: 24321423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation in stereoacuity: normative description, fixation disparity, and the roles of aging and gender.
    Zaroff CM; Knutelska M; Frumkes TE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Feb; 44(2):891-900. PubMed ID: 12556426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test.
    Holmes JM; Fawcett SL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):193-5. PubMed ID: 15652852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation: effects of stimulus spatial frequency and eccentricity.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 May; 160(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15836903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Systematic Comparison of Static and Dynamic Cues for Depth Perception.
    Tidbury LP; Brooks KR; O'Connor AR; Wuerger SM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jul; 57(8):3545-53. PubMed ID: 27379579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of stereoscopic acuity: longitudinal study using a computer-based random-dot stereo test.
    Takai Y; Sato M; Tan R; Hirai T
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2005; 49(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15692766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thresholds for sine-wave corrugations defined by binocular disparity in random dot stereograms: Factor analysis of individual differences reveals two stereoscopic mechanisms tuned for spatial frequency.
    Peterzell DH; Serrano-Pedraza I; Widdall M; Read JCA
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():127-135. PubMed ID: 29155009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.