256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20883487)
1. Head-to-head comparison of two online nomograms for prostate biopsy outcome prediction.
Oliveira M; Marques V; Carvalho AP; Santos A
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1780-3. PubMed ID: 20883487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of two on-line risk calculators versus the detection of circulating prostate cells for the detection of high risk prostate cancer at first biopsy.].
Murray NP; Fuentealba C; Reyes E; Jacob O
Arch Esp Urol; 2017 Jun; 70(5):503-512. PubMed ID: 28613202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A direct comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of three prostate cancer nomograms designed to predict the likelihood of a positive initial transrectal biopsy.
Ouzaid I; Yates DR; Hupertan V; Mozer P; Chartier-Kastler E; Haertig A; Bitker MO; Rouprêt M
Prostate; 2012 Aug; 72(11):1200-6. PubMed ID: 22213470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development, validation, and head-to-head comparison of logistic regression-based nomograms and artificial neural network models predicting prostate cancer on initial extended biopsy.
Kawakami S; Numao N; Okubo Y; Koga F; Yamamoto S; Saito K; Fujii Y; Yonese J; Masuda H; Kihara K; Fukui I
Eur Urol; 2008 Sep; 54(3):601-11. PubMed ID: 18207312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative performance analysis of total prostate-specific antigen, percentage free prostate-specific antigen, prostate-specific antigen velocity and urinary prostate cancer gene 3 in the first, second and third repeat prostate biopsy.
Auprich M; Augustin H; Budäus L; Kluth L; Mannweiler S; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Pummer K; Chun FK
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1627-35. PubMed ID: 21939492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial and European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer risk calculators indicating a positive prostate biopsy: a comparison.
van den Bergh RC; Roobol MJ; Wolters T; van Leeuwen PJ; Schröder FH
BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(9):1068-73. PubMed ID: 18715246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Prospective validation of a nomogram predictive of a positive initial prostate biopsy].
Ramírez-Backhaus M; Bahilo P; Arlandis S; Santamaría Navarro C; Pontones Moreno JL; Jiménez-Cruz F
Actas Urol Esp; 2010 Jan; 34(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 20223131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External validation of Chun, PCPT, ERSPC, Kawakami, and Karakiewicz nomograms in the prediction of prostate cancer: A single center cohort-study.
De Nunzio C; Lombardo R; Tema G; Alkhatatbeh H; Gandaglia G; Briganti A; Tubaro A
Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 36(8):364.e1-364.e7. PubMed ID: 29880458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors predicting prostatic biopsy Gleason sum under grading.
Stackhouse DA; Sun L; Schroeck FR; Jayachandran J; Caire AA; Acholo CO; Robertson CN; Albala DM; Polascik TJ; Donatucci CF; Maloney KE; Moul JW
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):118-22; discussion 123-4. PubMed ID: 19447436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for forecasting high-grade prostate cancer to reduce unnecessary biopsies within the prostate-specific antigen gray zone.
Niu XK; Li J; Das SK; Xiong Y; Yang CB; Peng T
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):11. PubMed ID: 28143433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer risk prediction using the novel versions of the European Randomised Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) risk calculators: independent validation and comparison in a contemporary European cohort.
Poyet C; Nieboer D; Bhindi B; Kulkarni GS; Wiederkehr C; Wettstein MS; Largo R; Wild P; Sulser T; Hermanns T
BJU Int; 2016 Mar; 117(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 26332503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Head-to-head comparison of the Montreal nomogram with the detection of primary malignant circulating prostate cells to predict prostate cancer at initial biopsy in Chilean men with suspicion of prostate cancer.
Murray NP; Reyes E; Fuentealba C; Orellana N; Jacob O; Badilla S
Urol Oncol; 2015 May; 33(5):203.e19-25. PubMed ID: 25746939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis of three risk assessment tools in Australian patients with prostate cancer.
Tamblyn DJ; Chopra S; Yu C; Kattan MW; Pinnock C; Kopsaftis T
BJU Int; 2011 Nov; 108 Suppl 2():51-6. PubMed ID: 22085129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive modeling for the presence of prostate carcinoma using clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound parameters in patients with prostate specific antigen levels < or = 10 ng/mL.
Garzotto M; Hudson RG; Peters L; Hsieh YC; Barrera E; Mori M; Beer TM; Klein T
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 98(7):1417-22. PubMed ID: 14508828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic predisposition to early recurrence in clinically localized prostate cancer.
Borque Á; del Amo J; Esteban LM; Ars E; Hernández C; Planas J; Arruza A; Llarena R; Palou J; Herranz F; Raventós CX; Tejedor D; Artieda M; Simon L; Martínez A; Carceller E; Suárez M; Allué M; Sanz G; Morote J
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):549-58. PubMed ID: 22759231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a new nomogram for predicting the probability of a positive initial prostate biopsy in Japanese patients with serum PSA levels less than 10 ng/mL.
Kawamura K; Suzuki H; Kamiya N; Imamoto T; Yano M; Miura J; Shimbo M; Suzuki N; Nakatsu H; Ichikawa T
Int J Urol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):598-603. PubMed ID: 18462353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward an MRI-based nomogram for the prediction of transperineal prostate biopsy outcome: A physician and patient decision tool.
Lee SM; Liyanage SH; Wulaningsih W; Wolfe K; Carr T; Younis C; Van Hemelrijck M; Popert R; Acher P
Urol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):664.e11-664.e18. PubMed ID: 28801025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The outcomes of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate in a New Zealand population.
Lienert AR; Davidson PJ; Wells JE
N Z Med J; 2009 Jan; 122(1288):39-49. PubMed ID: 19182841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are prostate biopsies necessary for all patients 75years and older?
Chen Y; Fan Y; Yang Y; Jin J; Zhou L; He Z; Zhao Z; He Q; Wang X; Yu W; Wu S
J Geriatr Oncol; 2018 Mar; 9(2):124-129. PubMed ID: 28939384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
