BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

5909 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20883488)

  • 1. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
    Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
    BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Klein E
    Urology; 1996 Aug; 48(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 8753737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features.
    Vargas C; Kestin LL; Weed DW; Krauss D; Vicini FA; Martinez AA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):714-24. PubMed ID: 15708249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
    Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
    J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: ten years of follow-up.
    Rouanne M; Rode J; Campeggi A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Salomon L
    Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 23883410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of factors predicting response to adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.
    Kamat AM; Babaian K; Cheung MR; Naya Y; Huang SH; Kuban D; Babaian RJ
    J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1860-3. PubMed ID: 14532793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
    Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
    J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radical prostatectomy improves progression-free and cancer-specific survival in men with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era: a confirmatory study.
    Steuber T; Budäus L; Walz J; Zorn KC; Schlomm T; Chun F; Ahyai S; Fisch M; Sauter G; Huland H; Graefen M; Haese A
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1755-61. PubMed ID: 20942833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.
    Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Positive surgical margins are a risk factor for significant biochemical recurrence only in intermediate-risk disease.
    Corcoran NM; Hovens CM; Metcalfe C; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Casey RG; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Costello AJ; Gleave ME
    BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):821-7. PubMed ID: 22257140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.
    Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Martin SK; Amling CL; Zincke H
    Urology; 1997 Nov; 50(5):733-9. PubMed ID: 9372884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conformal radiotherapy for detectable PSA following radical prostatectomy: efficacy and predictive factors of recurrence.
    Delongchamps NB; Zerbib M; Mejean A; Rouach Y; Debre B; Peyromaure M
    Can J Urol; 2009 Oct; 16(5):4813-9. PubMed ID: 19796456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 296.