163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20883758)
1. Velocity profiles and shear strain rate variability in the USP Dissolution Testing Apparatus 2 at different impeller agitation speeds.
Bai G; Wang Y; Armenante PM
Int J Pharm; 2011 Jan; 403(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 20883758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hydrodynamic investigation of USP dissolution test apparatus II.
Bai G; Armenante PM; Plank RV; Gentzler M; Ford K; Harmon P
J Pharm Sci; 2007 Sep; 96(9):2327-49. PubMed ID: 17573698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental and computational determination of the hydrodynamics of mini vessel dissolution testing systems.
Wang B; Armenante PM
Int J Pharm; 2016 Aug; 510(1):336-49. PubMed ID: 27317988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shear-induced variability in the United States Pharmacopeia Apparatus 2: modifications to the existing system.
Baxter JL; Kukura J; Muzzio FJ
AAPS J; 2006 Jan; 7(4):E857-64. PubMed ID: 16594638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of the paddle dissolution apparatus: agitation rate, mixing patterns, and fluid velocities.
McCarthy LG; Bradley G; Sexton JC; Corrigan OI; Healy AM
AAPS PharmSciTech; 2004 Apr; 5(2):e31. PubMed ID: 15760089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shear distribution and variability in the USP Apparatus 2 under turbulent conditions.
Kukura J; Baxter JL; Muzzio FJ
Int J Pharm; 2004 Jul; 279(1-2):9-17. PubMed ID: 15234789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Performance in a USP 2 Setup and Alternative Stirrers and Vessel Designs: A Systematic Computational Investigation.
Salehi N; Al-Gousous J; Hens B; Amidon GL; Ziff RM; Amidon GE
Mol Pharm; 2024 May; 21(5):2406-2414. PubMed ID: 38639477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Velocity distribution and shear rate variability resulting from changes in the impeller location in the USP dissolution testing apparatus II.
Bai G; Armenante PM
Pharm Res; 2008 Feb; 25(2):320-36. PubMed ID: 18040760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of hydrodynamics in the basket dissolution apparatus using computational fluid dynamics--dissolution rate implications.
D'Arcy DM; Corrigan OI; Healy AM
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2006 Feb; 27(2-3):259-67. PubMed ID: 16314078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D hydrodynamics and shear rates' variability in the United States Pharmacopeia Paddle Dissolution Apparatus.
Ameur H; Bouzit M
Int J Pharm; 2013 Aug; 452(1-2):42-51. PubMed ID: 23680733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hydrodynamic, mass transfer, and dissolution effects induced by tablet location during dissolution testing.
Bai G; Armenante PM
J Pharm Sci; 2009 Apr; 98(4):1511-31. PubMed ID: 18781589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydrodynamics-induced variability in the USP apparatus II dissolution test.
Baxter JL; Kukura J; Muzzio FJ
Int J Pharm; 2005 Mar; 292(1-2):17-28. PubMed ID: 15725550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental and computational determination of blend time in USP Dissolution Testing Apparatus II.
Bai G; Armenante PM; Plank RV
J Pharm Sci; 2007 Nov; 96(11):3072-86. PubMed ID: 17828739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigating the effect of solubility and density gradients on local hydrodynamics and drug dissolution in the USP 4 dissolution apparatus.
D'Arcy DM; Liu B; Corrigan OI
Int J Pharm; 2011 Oct; 419(1-2):175-85. PubMed ID: 21843609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental determination of the velocity distribution in USP Apparatus 1 (basket apparatus) using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV).
Sirasitthichoke C; Perivilli S; Liddell MR; Armenante PM
Int J Pharm X; 2021 Dec; 3():100078. PubMed ID: 34027384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Towards determining appropriate hydrodynamic conditions for in vitro in vivo correlations using computational fluid dynamics.
D'Arcy DM; Healy AM; Corrigan OI
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2009 Jun; 37(3-4):291-9. PubMed ID: 19491018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computational hydrodynamic comparison of a mini vessel and a USP 2 dissolution testing system to predict the dynamic operating conditions for similarity of dissolution performance.
Wang B; Bredael G; Armenante PM
Int J Pharm; 2018 Mar; 539(1-2):112-130. PubMed ID: 29341921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Numerical study of a centrifugal blood pump with different impeller profiles.
Song G; Chua LP; Lim TM
ASAIO J; 2010; 56(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 20019595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Study of velocity and shear stress distributions in the impeller passages and the volute of a bio-centrifugal ventricular assist device.
Chua LP; Ong KS; Song G
Artif Organs; 2008 May; 32(5):376-87. PubMed ID: 18471167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hydrodynamic simulation (computational fluid dynamics) of asymmetrically positioned tablets in the paddle dissolution apparatus: impact on dissolution rate and variability.
D'Arcy DM; Corrigan OI; Healy AM
J Pharm Pharmacol; 2005 Oct; 57(10):1243-50. PubMed ID: 16259752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
