These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20884047)

  • 1. Factors influencing marginal cavity adaptation of nanofiller containing resin composite restorations.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ; Wegner K; Utterodt A; Komatsu M; Wöstmann B; Balkenhol M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Dec; 26(12):1166-75. PubMed ID: 20884047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations.
    Oliveira LC; Duarte S; Araujo CA; Abrahão A
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):e159-69. PubMed ID: 20031198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polymerization stress, shrinkage and elastic modulus of current low-shrinkage restorative composites.
    Boaro LC; Gonçalves F; Guimarães TC; Ferracane JL; Versluis A; Braga RR
    Dent Mater; 2010 Dec; 26(12):1144-50. PubMed ID: 20832850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of an analytical expression of resin composite curing stresses with in vitro observations of marginal cracking.
    Kahler B; Swain MV; Kotousov A
    Am J Dent; 2010 Dec; 23(6):357-64. PubMed ID: 21344837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flowable resin and marginal gap on tooth third medial cavity involving enamel and radicular cementum: a SEM evaluation of two restoration techniques.
    Lo Giudice G; Cicciù M; Cervino G; Lizio A; Visco AM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):763-9. PubMed ID: 23649060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft-start polymerization and marginal gap formation in vitro.
    Sahafi A; Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):145-7. PubMed ID: 11572291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of light-curing method and irradiation time on marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations.
    Yoshikawa T; Nakaoki Y; Takada T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():63A-67A. PubMed ID: 14674502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations.
    Giachetti L; Scaminaci Russo D; Bambi C; Grandini R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):79-88. PubMed ID: 16957794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interactions of self-etch adhesives with resin composites.
    Kurokawa R; Finger WJ; Hoffmann M; Endo T; Kanehira M; Komatsu M; Manabe A
    J Dent; 2007 Dec; 35(12):923-9. PubMed ID: 17935852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of boundary conditions and filling technique of resin composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Reis A; Schroeder M; Balducci I; Versluis A; Ballester RY
    J Dent; 2004 Aug; 32(6):459-70. PubMed ID: 15240064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of shrinkage strain, modulus, and instrument compliance on polymerization shrinkage stress of light-cured composites during the initial curing stage.
    Min SH; Ferracane J; Lee IB
    Dent Mater; 2010 Oct; 26(10):1024-33. PubMed ID: 20684977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage.
    Ilie N; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jul; 22(7):593-601. PubMed ID: 16289723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations.
    Attar N; Korkmaz Y
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contraction stress of low-shrinkage composite materials assessed with different testing systems.
    Marchesi G; Breschi L; Antoniolli F; Di Lenarda R; Ferracane J; Cadenaro M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Oct; 26(10):947-53. PubMed ID: 20566212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method of improving marginal adaptation by elimination of singular stress point in composite restorations during resin photo-polymerization.
    Petrovic LM; Drobac MR; Stojanac ILj; Atanackovic TM
    Dent Mater; 2010 May; 26(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 20189637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.