324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20884204)
1. Removal of sulphate, COD and Cr(VI) in simulated and real wastewater by sulphate reducing bacteria enrichment in small bioreactor and FTIR study.
Singh R; Kumar A; Kirrolia A; Kumar R; Yadav N; Bishnoi NR; Lohchab RK
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):677-82. PubMed ID: 20884204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sulfidogenic fluidized bed treatment of real acid mine drainage water.
Sahinkaya E; Gunes FM; Ucar D; Kaksonen AH
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):683-9. PubMed ID: 20832297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Removal of chromium and lead by a sulfate-reducing consortium using peat moss as carbon source.
Márquez-Reyes JM; López-Chuken UJ; Valdez-González A; Luna-Olvera HA
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Sep; 144():128-34. PubMed ID: 23859988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pilot-scale removal of chromium from industrial wastewater using the ChromeBac system.
Ahmad WA; Zakaria ZA; Khasim AR; Alias MA; Ismail SM
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jun; 101(12):4371-8. PubMed ID: 20185301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliable method for assessing the COD mass balance of a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) treating sulphate-rich municipal wastewater.
Giménez JB; Carretero L; Gatti MN; Martí N; Borrás L; Ribes J; Seco A
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(3):494-502. PubMed ID: 22744678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Organics, sulfates and ammonia removal from acrylic fiber manufacturing wastewater using a combined Fenton-UASB (2 phase)-SBR system.
Li J; Luan Z; Yu L; Ji Z
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Nov; 102(22):10319-26. PubMed ID: 21937223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tannery effluent as a carbon source for biological sulphate reduction.
Boshoff G; Duncan J; Rose PD
Water Res; 2004 Jun; 38(11):2651-8. PubMed ID: 15207595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Activity of sulphate reducing bacteria according to COD/SO4(2-) ratio of acrylonitrile wastewater containing high sulphate.
Byun IG; Lee TH; Kim YO; Song SK; Park TJ
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):229-35. PubMed ID: 15137428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of sulfate reduction activity on biological treatment of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] contaminated electroplating wastewater under sulfate-rich condition.
Chang IS; Kim BH
Chemosphere; 2007 Jun; 68(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 17337035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of sulfidogenic anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) treating acidic and zinc-containing wastewater.
Bayrakdar A; Sahinkaya E; Gungor M; Uyanik S; Atasoy AD
Bioresour Technol; 2009 Oct; 100(19):4354-60. PubMed ID: 19428238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anaerobic treatment of landfill leachate by sulfate reduction.
Henry JG; Prasad D
Water Sci Technol; 2000; 41(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 11381997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Silage supports sulfate reduction in the treatment of metals- and sulfate-containing waste waters.
Wakeman KD; Erving L; Riekkola-Vanhanen ML; Puhakka JA
Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(17):4932-9. PubMed ID: 20708212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biotreatment of Cr(VI) contaminated waters by sulphate reducing bacteria fed with ethanol.
Pagnanelli F; Viggi CC; Cibati A; Uccelletti D; Toro L; Palleschi C
J Hazard Mater; 2012 Jan; 199-200():186-92. PubMed ID: 22104763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural network prediction of thermophilic (65 degrees C) sulfidogenic fluidized-bed reactor performance for the treatment of metal-containing wastewater.
Sahinkaya E; Ozkaya B; Kaksonen AH; Puhakka JA
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Jul; 97(4):780-7. PubMed ID: 17154306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Soil aquifer treatment of artificial wastewater under saturated conditions.
Essandoh HM; Tizaoui C; Mohamed MH; Amy G; Brdjanovic D
Water Res; 2011 Aug; 45(14):4211-26. PubMed ID: 21700308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Isolation and characterization of hexavalent chromium-reducing rhizospheric bacteria from a wetland.
Mauricio Gutiérrez A; Peña Cabriales JJ; Maldonado Vega M
Int J Phytoremediation; 2010; 12(4):317-34. PubMed ID: 20734910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anaerobic treatment for C and S removal in "zero-discharge" paper mills: effects of process design on S removal efficiencies.
van Lier JB; Lens PN; Pol LW
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 11575084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Removal of Cr (VI) with wheat-residue derived black carbon: reaction mechanism and adsorption performance.
Wang XS; Chen LF; Li FY; Chen KL; Wan WY; Tang YJ
J Hazard Mater; 2010 Mar; 175(1-3):816-22. PubMed ID: 19926221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The potential of compost-based biobarriers for Cr(VI) removal from contaminated groundwater: column test.
Boni MR; Sbaffoni S
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jul; 166(2-3):1087-95. PubMed ID: 19153005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
