125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20884254)
1. Decision curve analysis to compare 3 versions of Partin Tables to predict final pathologic stage.
Augustin H; Sun M; Isbarn H; Pummer K; Karakiewicz P
Urol Oncol; 2012; 30(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 20884254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three versions of Partin tables to predict final pathologic stage in a Chinese cohort: a decision curve analysis.
Xiao WJ; Ye DW; Yao XD; Zhang SL; Dai B
Urol Int; 2013; 91(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 23548872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Head-to-head comparison of three commonly used preoperative tools for prediction of lymph node invasion at radical prostatectomy.
Abdollah F; Schmitges J; Sun M; Thuret R; Djahangirian O; Tian Z; Shariat SF; Briganti A; Perrotte P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
Urology; 2011 Dec; 78(6):1363-7. PubMed ID: 22137704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are Partin tables suitable for Chinese patients with prostate cancer?
Shen XC; Qiu YQ; Zheng YC; Zhang SZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Nov; 125(21):3795-9. PubMed ID: 23106876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. External validation of the updated partin tables in a cohort of French and Italian men.
Bhojani N; Salomon L; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Shariat SF; Jeldres C; Zini L; Pharand D; Péloquin F; Arjane P; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Feb; 73(2):347-52. PubMed ID: 19004573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of accuracy among three generations of Partin tables in a Chinese cohort.
Xiao WJ; Ye DW; Yao XD; Zhang SL; Dai B; Wang CF; Wang J; Zhang HL; Shen YJ; Zhu Y; Zhu YP; Shi GH; Ma CG; Qin XJ; Lin GW
Can J Urol; 2011 Apr; 18(2):5619-24. PubMed ID: 21504650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of accuracy between the Partin tables of 1997 and 2001 to predict final pathological stage in clinically localized prostate cancer.
Augustin H; Eggert T; Wenske S; Karakiewicz PI; Palisaar J; Daghofer F; Huland H; Graefen M
J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):177-81. PubMed ID: 14665871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and Validation of Models to Predict Pathological Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy in Regional and National Cohorts.
Ötleş E; Denton BT; Qu B; Murali A; Merdan S; Auffenberg GB; Hiller SC; Lane BR; George AK; Singh K
J Urol; 2022 Feb; 207(2):358-366. PubMed ID: 34551595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multi-institutional external validation of seminal vesicle invasion nomograms: head-to-head comparison of Gallina nomogram versus 2007 Partin tables.
Zorn KC; Capitanio U; Jeldres C; Arjane P; Perrotte P; Shariat SF; Lee DI; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP; Shikanov SA; Gofrit ON; Thong AE; Albala DM; Sun L; Karakiewicz PI
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1461-7. PubMed ID: 18938046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T;
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Head to head comparison of nomograms predicting probability of lymph node invasion of prostate cancer in patients undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Walz J; Bladou F; Rousseau B; Laroche J; Salem N; Gravis G; Briganti A; Chun FK; Karakiewicz PI; Fournier G
Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 22386393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The newer the better? Comparison of the 1997 and 2001 partin tables for pathologic stage prediction of prostate cancer in China.
Gao X; Ren S; Lu X; Xu C; Sun Y
Urology; 2008 Nov; 72(5):1096-101. PubMed ID: 18822453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extent of pelvic lymph node dissection and the impact of standard template dissection on nomogram prediction of lymph node involvement.
Godoy G; Chong KT; Cronin A; Vickers A; Laudone V; Touijer K; Guillonneau B; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Coleman JA
Eur Urol; 2011 Aug; 60(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 21257258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Partin Tables cannot accurately predict the pathological stage at radical prostatectomy.
Bhojani N; Ahyai S; Graefen M; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Shariat SF; Jeldres C; Erbersdobler A; Schlomm T; Haese A; Steuber T; Heinzer H; Montorsi F; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Feb; 35(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 18786800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate cancers detected by saturation repeat biopsy impairs the Partin tables' accuracy to predict final pathological stage.
Augustin H; Auprich M; Mannweiler S; Pachernegg O; Al-Ali BM; Pummer K
BJU Int; 2012 Aug; 110(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 22093162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.
Tosoian JJ; Chappidi M; Feng Z; Humphreys EB; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Trock BJ
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 27367645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transition zone cancers undermine the predictive accuracy of Partin table stage predictions.
Steuber T; Karakiewicz PI; Augustin H; Erbersdobler A; Lange I; Haese A; Chun KH; Walz J; Graefen M; Huland H
J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):737-41. PubMed ID: 15711259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cancer-specific survival and predictors of prostate-specific antigen recurrence and survival in patients with seminal vesicle invasion after radical prostatectomy.
Secin FP; Bianco FJ; Vickers AJ; Reuter V; Wheeler T; Fearn PA; Eastham JA; Scardino PT
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2369-75. PubMed ID: 16649221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do prostate cancer nomograms give accurate information when applied to European patients?
Turo R; Forster JA; West RM; Prescott S; Paul AB; Cross WR
Scand J Urol; 2015 Feb; 49(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 24882277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nomograms to predict the pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in Korean men: comparison with western predictive tools using decision curve analysis.
Jeong CW; Jeong SJ; Hong SK; Lee SB; Ku JH; Byun SS; Jeong H; Kwak C; Kim HH; Lee E; Lee SE
Int J Urol; 2012 Sep; 19(9):846-52. PubMed ID: 22587373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
