These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

614 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20884328)

  • 1. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Kong L; Huang S; Yue Z; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Huang S; Kong L; Wang S
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2356-61. PubMed ID: 21964327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.
    Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):423-42. PubMed ID: 16634680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Working memory encoding delays top-down attention to visual cortex.
    Scalf PE; Dux PE; Marois R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2593-604. PubMed ID: 21281093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of attentional tags in working memory-driven attentional capture.
    Kuo CY; Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1301-7. PubMed ID: 24730739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dividing the mind: the necessary role of the frontal lobes in separating memory from search.
    Soto D; Humphreys GW; Heinke D
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1282-9. PubMed ID: 16529778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term visual associations affect attentional guidance.
    Olivers CN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jun; 137(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 20673859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional blink in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Kavcic V; Scheid E
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Feb; 49(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 21145330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of attention in binding visual features in working memory: evidence from cognitive ageing.
    Brown LA; Brockmole JR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):2067-79. PubMed ID: 20446186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The time it takes to turn a memory into a template.
    Wilschut A; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23603144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finding memory in search: the effect of visual working memory load on visual search.
    Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1457-66. PubMed ID: 20603775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cortical response to task-relevant stimuli presented outside the primary focus of attention.
    Houtkamp R; Braun J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Sep; 22(9):1980-92. PubMed ID: 19702464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial working memory and spatial attention rely on common neural processes in the intraparietal sulcus.
    Silk TJ; Bellgrove MA; Wrafter P; Mattingley JB; Cunnington R
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):718-24. PubMed ID: 20615473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early multisensory interactions affect the competition among multiple visual objects.
    Van der Burg E; Talsma D; Olivers CN; Hickey C; Theeuwes J
    Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):1208-18. PubMed ID: 21195781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
    Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional capture by working memory contents.
    Pan Y
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Jun; 64(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 20565178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.