BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20884592)

  • 1. Detectability of sine- versus square-wave disparity gratings: A challenge for current models of depth perception.
    Allenmark F; Read JC
    J Vis; 2010 Jul; 10(8):17. PubMed ID: 20884592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interaction between binocular rivalry and depth in plaid patterns.
    Buckthought A; Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(19):2543-56. PubMed ID: 17688905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coarse scales, fine scales, and their interactions in stereo vision.
    Farell B; Li S; McKee SP
    J Vis; 2004 Jun; 4(6):488-99. PubMed ID: 15330716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence for elongated receptive field structure for mechanisms subserving stereopsis.
    Chen CC; Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2691-702. PubMed ID: 16580041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues.
    Harwerth RS; Moeller MC; Wensveen JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discriminating depth in corrugated stereo surfaces: facilitation by a pedestal is explained by removal of uncertainty.
    Georgeson MA; Yates TA; Schofield AJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2321-8. PubMed ID: 18682260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal aspects of spatial interactions affecting stereo-matching solutions.
    Zhang ZL; Cantor C; Ghose T; Schor CM
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(27):3183-92. PubMed ID: 15482804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disparity increment thresholds for gratings.
    Farell B; Li S; McKee SP
    J Vis; 2004 Mar; 4(3):156-68. PubMed ID: 15086306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective biasing of stereo correspondence in an ambiguous stereogram.
    Goutcher R; Mamassian P
    Vision Res; 2005 Feb; 45(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 15610751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An integrative model of binocular vision: a stereo model utilizing interocularly unpaired points produces both depth and binocular rivalry.
    Hayashi R; Maeda T; Shimojo S; Tachi S
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(20):2367-80. PubMed ID: 15246753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Depth propagation and surface construction in 3-D vision.
    Georgeson MA; Yates TA; Schofield AJ
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 18977239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial frequency integration for binocular correspondence in macaque area V4.
    Kumano H; Tanabe S; Fujita I
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 99(1):402-8. PubMed ID: 17959744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thresholds for sine-wave corrugations defined by binocular disparity in random dot stereograms: Factor analysis of individual differences reveals two stereoscopic mechanisms tuned for spatial frequency.
    Peterzell DH; Serrano-Pedraza I; Widdall M; Read JCA
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():127-135. PubMed ID: 29155009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stereo channels with different temporal frequency tunings.
    Lee S; Shioiri S; Yaguchi H
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 17184805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Owls see in stereo much like humans do.
    van der Willigen RF
    J Vis; 2011 Jun; 11(7):10. PubMed ID: 21665984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preserved gain control for luminance contrast during binocular rivalry suppression.
    Watanabe K; Paik Y; Blake R
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(26):3065-71. PubMed ID: 15474579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of interocular correlation and contrast on stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 18317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of monocularly visible regions in depth and surface perception.
    Harris JM; Wilcox LM
    Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(22):2666-85. PubMed ID: 19577589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binocular correspondence in stereoscopic vision.
    Parker AJ; Harris JM; Cumming BG; Sumnall JH
    Eye (Lond); 1996; 10 ( Pt 2)():177-81. PubMed ID: 8776446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.