These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20884605)
1. Disparity, motion, and color information improve gloss constancy performance. Wendt G; Faul F; Ekroll V; Mausfeld R J Vis; 2010 Sep; 10(9):7. PubMed ID: 20884605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surface orientation, modulation frequency and the detection and perception of depth defined by binocular disparity and motion parallax. Bradshaw MF; Hibbard PB; Parton AD; Rose D; Langley K Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2636-44. PubMed ID: 16571356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Color appearance of real objects varying in material, hue, and shape. Giesel M; Gegenfurtner KR J Vis; 2010 Sep; 10(9):10. PubMed ID: 20884608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Highlights, disparity, and perceived gloss with convex and concave surfaces. Kerrigan IS; Adams WJ J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(1):9. PubMed ID: 23291649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monocular occlusions determine the perceived shape and depth of occluding surfaces. Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):11. PubMed ID: 20884560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Highlight disparity contributes to the authenticity and strength of perceived glossiness. Wendt G; Faul F; Mausfeld R J Vis; 2008 Jan; 8(1):14.1-10. PubMed ID: 18318617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disparity-defined objects moving in depth do not elicit three-dimensional shape constancy. Scarfe P; Hibbard PB Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1599-610. PubMed ID: 16364392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The swinging doors of perception: stereomotion without binocular matching. Brooks KR; Gillam BJ J Vis; 2006 Jun; 6(7):685-95. PubMed ID: 16895452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms. Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1603-14. PubMed ID: 15781076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Localization of monocular stimuli in different depth planes. Shimono K; Tam WJ; Asakura N; Ohmi M Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(20):2631-41. PubMed ID: 16005487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Color naming reveals our ability to distinguish between a colored background and colored light. Brenner E; Granzier JJ; Smeets JB J Vis; 2011 Jun; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 21659427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Matching perceived depth from disparity and from velocity: Modeling and psychophysics. Domini F; Caudek C Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jan; 133(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 19963200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variability in constancy of the perceived surface reflectance across different illumination statistics. Motoyoshi I; Matoba H Vision Res; 2012 Jan; 53(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 22138530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Depth from shading and disparity in humans and monkeys. Zhang Y; Weiner VS; Slocum WM; Schiller PH Vis Neurosci; 2007; 24(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 17640412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of a disparity pattern on the perception of direction: non-retinal information masks retinal information. Ishii M Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(12):1563-8. PubMed ID: 19324065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flash lag in depth. Harris LR; Duke PA; Kopinska A Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2735-42. PubMed ID: 16469350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]