These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20884936)

  • 21. Presurgical implant-site assessment and restoratively driven digital planning.
    Scherer MD
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):561-95. PubMed ID: 24993924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism.
    Van Assche N; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Jacobs R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Apr; 37(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 20447264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of length and location of edentulous area on the accuracy of prosthetic treatment plan incorporation into cone-beam computed tomography scans.
    Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; Lee DJ; McGlumphy EA; Yilmaz B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):300-307. PubMed ID: 29399999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dental implant imaging: TeraRecon's Dental 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography System.
    Garg AK
    Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Jun; 18(6):41-5. PubMed ID: 17682685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Zygomatic implant placement with flapless computer-guided surgery: a proposed clinical protocol.
    Schiroli G; Angiero F; Silvestrini-Biavati A; Benedicenti S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 69(12):2979-89. PubMed ID: 21835528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
    Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Radiologic techniques using CBCT and 3-D treatment planning for implant placement.
    Peck JN; Conte GJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Apr; 36(4):287-90, 292-4, 296-7. PubMed ID: 18481625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study.
    Katsoulis J; Pazera P; Mericske-Stern R
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 18783423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Three-dimensional plotting and printing of an implant drilling guide: simplifying guided implant surgery.
    Flügge TV; Nelson K; Schmelzeisen R; Metzger MC
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 71(8):1340-6. PubMed ID: 23866950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fully guided implant surgery using Magnetic Resonance Imaging - An in vitro study on accuracy in human mandibles.
    Flügge T; Ludwig U; Winter G; Amrein P; Kernen F; Nelson K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Aug; 31(8):737-746. PubMed ID: 32459868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Chan HL; Benavides E; Yeh CY; Fu JH; Rudek IE; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jan; 82(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 20653440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Are radiographic guides necessary? A paradigm shift in implant site assessment, digital planning, and surgical guide fabrication.
    Scherer MD
    Dent Today; 2014 Aug; 33(8):62, 64, 66-7. PubMed ID: 25174199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital design of a surgical guide for placement of definitive implants before orthodontic treatment.
    Bayraktaroglu HC; Kim JS; Londono J; Baker PS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 25935081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guide with a handpiece guidance apparatus: a case report.
    Ozan O; Seker E; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S; Ersoy AE
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):603-9. PubMed ID: 21767212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography-derived laboratory-based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients.
    Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Knierim K; Behneke N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Feb; 23(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 21443593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
    Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictably replacing maxillary incisors with implants using 3-D planning and guided implant surgery.
    Wöhrle PS
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014; 35(10):758-62, 764-6, 768. PubMed ID: 25454529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of full guided vs. half-guided implant surgery.
    Kühl S; Zürcher S; Mahid T; Müller-Gerbl M; Filippi A; Cattin P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 22551385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. CAD/CAM guided surgery in implant dentistry. A review of software packages and step-by-step protocols for planning surgical guides.
    Scherer MD; Kattadiyil MT; Parciak E; Puri S
    Alpha Omegan; 2014; 107(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 24881445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use.
    Jacobs R; Salmon B; Codari M; Hassan B; Bornstein MM
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 29764458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.