These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20884936)

  • 41. In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides.
    Skjerven H; Riis UH; Herlofsson BB; Ellingsen JE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 30695088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An alternative method to match planned and achieved positions of implants, after virtual planning using cone-beam CT data and surgical guide templates--a method reducing patient radiation exposure (part I).
    Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 38(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 19939692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning.
    Chan HL; Misch K; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2010 Aug; 19(4):288-98. PubMed ID: 20683285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors.
    Ganz SD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Jun; 29(5):256-8, 260-2, 264-7; quiz 268, 278. PubMed ID: 18795643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches.
    Vieira DM; Sotto-Maior BS; Barros CA; Reis ES; Francischone CE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1347-51. PubMed ID: 24066327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. CAD/CAM options in dental implant treatment planning.
    Morris JB
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2010 May; 38(5):333-6. PubMed ID: 20572527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.
    Ozan O; Turkyilmaz I; Ersoy AE; McGlumphy EA; Rosenstiel SF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19138616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology.
    van der Zel JM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. SIMPLANT® computer-guided implant treatment software: unlocking digital potential.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014; 35(10):782. PubMed ID: 25742683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam computerized tomography-aided surgical guidance system for dental implant placement: an ex vivo study.
    Murat S; Kamburoğlu K; Özen T
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Dec; 38(6):706-12. PubMed ID: 21767205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Deformation of stereolithographically produced surgical guides: an observational case series report.
    Stumpel LJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):442-53. PubMed ID: 20156227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Virtual implant planning and fully guided implant surgery using magnetic resonance imaging-Proof of principle.
    Flügge T; Ludwig U; Hövener JB; Kohal R; Wismeijer D; Nelson K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jun; 31(6):575-583. PubMed ID: 32105363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. 3D accuracy of implant positions in template-guided implant placement as a function of the remaining teeth and the surgical procedure: a retrospective study.
    Schnutenhaus S; Edelmann C; Rudolph H; Dreyhaupt J; Luthardt RG
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jul; 22(6):2363-2372. PubMed ID: 29356920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Use of cone beam computed tomography and a laser intraoral scanner in virtual dental implant surgery: part 1.
    Lee CY; Ganz SD; Wong N; Suzuki JB
    Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 22814549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Cerec meets Galileos--integrated implantology for completely virtual implant planning.
    Reiz SD; Neugebauer J; Karapetian VE; Ritter L
    Int J Comput Dent; 2014; 17(2):145-57. PubMed ID: 25098162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Possibilities and limitations of implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates.
    Nickenig HJ; Eitner S; Rothamel D; Wichmann M; Zöller JE
    Int J Comput Dent; 2012; 15(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 22930944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.
    Dreiseidler T; Neugebauer J; Ritter L; Lingohr T; Rothamel D; Mischkowski RA; Zöller JE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter?
    Widmann G; Fischer B; Berggren JP; Dennhardt A; Schullian P; Reto B; Puelacher W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 27183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Surgery.
    Panchal N; Mahmood L; Retana A; Emery R
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2019 Nov; 31(4):539-547. PubMed ID: 31563194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
    González-García R; Monje F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.