These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20884936)

  • 61. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.
    Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
    Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
    J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. An Accuracy Study of Computer-Planned Implant Placement in the Augmented Maxilla Using Mucosa-Supported Surgical Templates.
    Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Bergé SJ; Soehardi RA; Xi T; de Haan AF; Schutyser F; Maal TJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1154-63. PubMed ID: 25181255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Comparison of Virtual Dental Implant Planning Using the Full Cross-Sectional and Transaxial Capabilities of Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Reformatted Panoramic Imaging and 3D Modeling.
    Khan M; Elathamna EN; Lin WS; Harris BT; Farman AG; Scheetz JP; Morton D; Scarfe WC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(4):814-9. PubMed ID: 26252033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Radiopaque dental impression method for radiographic interpretation, digital alignment, and surgical guide fabrication for dental implant placement.
    Scherer MD; Roh HK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):343-6. PubMed ID: 25702970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Computer-guided implant surgery: indications and guidelines for use.
    Orentlicher G; Horowitz A; Abboud M
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2012; 33(10):720-32; quiz 733. PubMed ID: 24964483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.
    Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL
    J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region: a second attempt introducing cone beam computed tomography.
    Uchida Y; Noguchi N; Goto M; Yamashita Y; Hanihara T; Takamori H; Sato I; Kawai T; Yosue T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):744-50. PubMed ID: 19304029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I. The concept.
    Lal K; White GS; Morea DN; Wright RF
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 16433652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Surgical positioning of orthodontic mini-implants with guides fabricated on models replicated with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kim SH; Choi YS; Hwang EH; Chung KR; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4 Suppl):S82-9. PubMed ID: 17448391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Transference of virtual planning and planning over biomedical prototypes for dental implant placement using guided surgery.
    Viegas VN; Dutra V; Pagnoncelli RM; de Oliveira MG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Mar; 21(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 20074239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Guided surgery for implant therapy.
    Orentlicher G; Abboud M
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2011 May; 23(2):239-56, v-vi. PubMed ID: 21492799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Exploring Effectiveness of Computer-Aided Planning in Implant Positioning for a Single Immediate Implant Placement.
    Edelmann AR; Hosseini B; Byrd WC; Preisser JS; Tyndall DA; Nguyen T; Bencharit S
    J Oral Implantol; 2016 Jun; 42(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 26652644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Accuracy of a cone beam computed tomography-guided surgical stent for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
    Yu JJ; Kim GT; Choi YS; Hwang EH; Paek J; Kim SH; Huang JC
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Mar; 82(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 21875317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures.
    Naitoh M; Nakahara K; Suenaga Y; Gotoh K; Kondo S; Ariji E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):e25-31. PubMed ID: 20123365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Anatomical landmarks of mandibular interforaminal region related to dental implant placement with 3D CBCT: comparison between edentulous and dental mandibles.
    Sener E; Onem E; Akar GC; Govsa F; Ozer MA; Pinar Y; Mert A; Baksi Sen BG
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Jun; 40(6):615-623. PubMed ID: 29124343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Should Cone Beam Computed Tomography Be Routinely Obtained in Implant Planning?
    Omami G; Al Yafi F
    Dent Clin North Am; 2019 Jul; 63(3):363-379. PubMed ID: 31097132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Clinical application of a stereolithographic surgical guide for simple positioning of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Kim SH; Kang JM; Choi B; Nelson G
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):371-82. PubMed ID: 19146019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. To Assess and Evaluate the Variation of Mandibular Anatomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Before Planning an Implant Surgery: A Population-based Retrospective Study.
    Kapoor V; Kumar N; Dahiya K; Sikka R; Sirana P; Singh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1381-1385. PubMed ID: 30602645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Use of a surgical template for minimally invasive second-stage surgery: A dental technique.
    Garcia-Hammaker S; George FM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 30017158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.