These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20884944)

  • 1. How reliable are scientific studies?
    Munafò MR; Flint J
    Br J Psychiatry; 2010 Oct; 197(4):257-8. PubMed ID: 20884944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The importance of publication bias in medical-scientific literature].
    de Melker HE; Rosendaal FR; Vandenbroucke JP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Oct; 137(42):2126-30. PubMed ID: 8232658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease.
    Lohmueller KE; Pearce CL; Pike M; Lander ES; Hirschhorn JN
    Nat Genet; 2003 Feb; 33(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 12524541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic polymorphisms and multifactorial diseases: facts and fallacies revealed by the glucocorticoid receptor gene.
    van Rossum EF; Russcher H; Lamberts SW
    Trends Endocrinol Metab; 2005 Dec; 16(10):445-50. PubMed ID: 16275120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. We need more research on causes and consequences, as well as on solutions.
    Fanelli D
    Addiction; 2015 Jan; 110(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 25515827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the Probability that a Finding Is Genuine for Large-Scale Genetic Association Studies.
    Kuo CL; Vsevolozhskaya OA; Zaykin DV
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0124107. PubMed ID: 25955023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using dual-criteria methods to supplement visual inspection: Replication and extension.
    Falligant JM; McNulty MK; Hausman NL; Rooker GW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jul; 53(3):1789-1798. PubMed ID: 31851379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research practices that can prevent an inflation of false-positive rates.
    Murayama K; Pekrun R; Fiedler K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2014 May; 18(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 23965303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reflections on publication criteria for genetic association studies.
    Begg CB
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Jun; 14(6):1364-5. PubMed ID: 15941941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publication bias and the canonization of false facts.
    Nissen SB; Magidson T; Gross K; Bergstrom CT
    Elife; 2016 Dec; 5():. PubMed ID: 27995896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Publication policy or publication bias?
    Byrnes G; Gurrin L; Dowty J; Hopper JL
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Jun; 14(6):1363. PubMed ID: 15941940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reducing publication bias through trial registration.
    Abaid LN; Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1434-7. PubMed ID: 17540818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Challenges in reproducibility of genetic association studies: lessons learned from the obesity field.
    Li A; Meyre D
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2013 Apr; 37(4):559-67. PubMed ID: 22584455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The incentive to publish negative studies: how beta-blockers and depression got stuck in the publication cycle.
    Luijendijk HJ; Koolman X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 22342262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preventing the ends from justifying the means: withholding results to address publication bias in peer-review.
    Button KS; Bal L; Clark A; Shipley T
    BMC Psychol; 2016 Dec; 4(1):59. PubMed ID: 27903302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Test had 10% false positive rate.
    Seagroatt V; Stratton I
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):470; author reply 470-1. PubMed ID: 9492688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Intentional and Non-Intentional Distortion of Research Findings].
    Kamińska D; Kusztal M
    Polim Med; 2015; 45(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 26630723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Publication bias in orthopaedic research: an analysis of scientific factors associated with publication in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume).
    Okike K; Kocher MS; Mehlman CT; Heckman JD; Bhandari M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Mar; 90(3):595-601. PubMed ID: 18310710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A critique of the false-positive report probability.
    Lucke JF
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 18720477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unpublished results hide the decline effect.
    Schooler J
    Nature; 2011 Feb; 470(7335):437. PubMed ID: 21350443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.