103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20884973)
1. Uncemented computer-assisted design-computer-assisted manufacture femoral components in revision total hip replacement: a minimum follow-up of ten years.
Muirhead-Allwood S; Sandiford NA; Skinner JA; Hua J; Muirhead W; Kabir C; Walker PS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Oct; 92(10):1370-5. PubMed ID: 20884973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uncemented custom computer-assisted design and manufacture of hydroxyapatite-coated femoral components: survival at 10 to 17 years.
Muirhead-Allwood SK; Sandiford N; Skinner JA; Hua J; Kabir C; Walker PS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Aug; 92(8):1079-84. PubMed ID: 20675750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term results of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component in total hip replacement: a 15- to 21-year follow-up study.
Rajaratnam SS; Jack C; Tavakkolizadeh A; George MD; Fletcher RJ; Hankins M; Shepperd JA
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Jan; 90(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 18160495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision total hip replacement using cemented collarless double-taper femoral components.
Howie DW; Wimhurst JA; McGee MA; Carbone TA; Badaruddin BS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jul; 89(7):879-86. PubMed ID: 17673579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intermediate-term radiographic and patient outcomes in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular calcar design and porous plasma coating.
Amanatullah DF; Meehan JP; Cullen AB; Kim SH; Jamali AA
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1451-4. PubMed ID: 21497483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survivorship of femoral revision hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis.
Hungerford MW; Hungerford DS; Khanuja HS; Pietryak BP; Jones LC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Nov; 88 Suppl 3():126-30. PubMed ID: 17079378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impaction femoral allografting at revision hip arthroplasty: uncemented versus cemented technique using a Freeman femoral component.
Masterson S; Lidder S; Scott G
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jan; 94(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22219247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Femoral impaction bone allografting with an Exeter cemented collarless, polished, tapered stem in revision hip replacement: a mean follow-up of 10.5 years.
Wraighte PJ; Howard PW
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Aug; 90(8):1000-4. PubMed ID: 18669953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The S-ROM hydroxyapatite proximally-coated modular femoral stem in revision hip replacement: results of 397 hips at a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Imbuldeniya AM; Walter WK; Zicat BA; Walter WL
Bone Joint J; 2014 Jun; 96-B(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 24891571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term results for the uncemented Zweymuller/Alloclassic hip endoprosthesis. A 15-year minimum follow-up of 320 hip operations.
Suckel A; Geiger F; Kinzl L; Wulker N; Garbrecht M
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):846-53. PubMed ID: 18789635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early performance-based and patient-reported outcomes of a contemporary taper fit bone-conserving short stem femoral component in total hip arthroplasty.
Hossain F; Konan S; Volpin A; Haddad FS
Bone Joint J; 2017 Apr; 99-B(4 Supple B):49-55. PubMed ID: 28363894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mid-term results of the modular ANCA-Fit femoral component in total hip replacement.
Blakey CM; Eswaramoorthy VK; Hamilton LC; Biant LC; Field RE
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Dec; 91(12):1561-5. PubMed ID: 19949117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up.
Vendittoli PA; Rivière C; Roy AG; Barry J; Lusignan D; Lavigne M
Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1464-73. PubMed ID: 24151264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Freeman femoral component with hydroxyapatite coating and retention of the neck: an update with a minimum follow-up of 17 years.
Mannan K; Freeman MA; Scott G
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 20357321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component.
McLaughlin JR; Lee KR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jun; 90(6):1290-6. PubMed ID: 18519323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented primary stem in 79 patients.
Thorey F; Lerch M; Kiel H; von Lewinski G; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Windhagen H
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Jul; 128(7):673-8. PubMed ID: 17909823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uncemented grit-blasted straight tapered titanium stems in patients younger than fifty-five years of age. Fifteen to twenty-year results.
Aldinger PR; Jung AW; Pritsch M; Breusch S; Thomsen M; Ewerbeck V; Parsch D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jun; 91(6):1432-9. PubMed ID: 19487522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Bicontact cementless primary total hip arthroplasty: long-term results.
Swamy G; Pace A; Quah C; Howard P
Int Orthop; 2012 May; 36(5):915-20. PubMed ID: 20830472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
