These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20885953)

  • 1. From preferred to actual mate characteristics: the case of human body shape.
    Courtiol A; Picq S; Godelle B; Raymond M; Ferdy JB
    PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):e13010. PubMed ID: 20885953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are human mating preferences with respect to height reflected in actual pairings?
    Stulp G; Buunk AP; Pollet TV; Nettle D; Verhulst S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54186. PubMed ID: 23342102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in preference for risky behaviors during courtship.
    Prokop P; Pazda A
    Scand J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 61(4):560-564. PubMed ID: 32103513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Body height preferences and actual dimorphism in stature between partners in two non-Western societies (Hadza and Tsimane').
    Sorokowski P; Sorokowska A; Butovskaya M; Stulp G; Huanca T; Fink B
    Evol Psychol; 2015 Jun; 13(2):455-69. PubMed ID: 26079105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Jealousy, Consent, and Compersion Within Monogamous and Consensually Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships.
    Mogilski JK; Reeve SD; Nicolas SCA; Donaldson SH; Mitchell VE; Welling LLM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2019 Aug; 48(6):1811-1828. PubMed ID: 30607710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do mate preferences influence actual mating decisions? Evidence from computer simulations and three studies of mated couples.
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jul; 111(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 27337140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Men's, but not women's, sociosexual orientation predicts couples' perceptions of sexually dimorphic cues in own-sex faces.
    Kandrik M; Fincher CL; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Jul; 43(5):965-71. PubMed ID: 24366658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facialmetric similarities mediate mate choice: sexual imprinting on opposite-sex parents.
    Bereczkei T; Hegedus G; Hajnal G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Jan; 276(1654):91-8. PubMed ID: 18765339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Putative Son's Attractiveness Alters the Perceived Attractiveness of the Putative Father.
    Prokop P
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Aug; 44(6):1713-21. PubMed ID: 25731909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a shared sexual concern of couples II: association of female partner characteristics with male partner ED treatment seeking and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor utilization.
    Fisher WA; Eardley I; McCabe M; Sand M
    J Sex Med; 2009 Nov; 6(11):3111-24. PubMed ID: 19674250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-Perceived Mate Value, Facial Attractiveness, and Mate Preferences: Do Desirable Men Want It All?
    Arnocky S
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(1):1474704918763271. PubMed ID: 29534596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preferred and actual relative height among homosexual male partners vary with preferred dominance and sex role.
    Valentova JV; Stulp G; Třebický V; Havlíček J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86534. PubMed ID: 24466136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Verbal compliments as a differential source of mate poaching threat for men and women.
    Brown CM; Daniels ER; Lustgraaf CJ; Sacco DF
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Aug; 12(4):736-56. PubMed ID: 25300051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries.
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM; Asao K; Sorokowska A; Sorokowski P; Aavik T; Akello G; Alhabahba MM; Alm C; Amjad N; Anjum A; Atama CS; Duyar DA; Ayebare R; Batres C; Bendixen M; Bensafia A; Bizumic B; Boussena M; Butovskaya M; Can S; Cantarero K; Carrier A; Cetinkaya H; Croy I; Cueto RM; Czub M; Dronova D; Dural S; Duyar I; Ertugrul B; Espinosa A; Estevan I; Esteves CS; Fang L; Frackowiak T; Garduño JC; González KU; Guemaz F; Gyuris P; Halamová M; Herak I; Horvat M; Hromatko I; Hui CM; Jaafar JL; Jiang F; Kafetsios K; Kavčič T; Kennair LEO; Kervyn N; Thi Khanh Ha T; Khilji IA; Köbis NC; Lan HM; Láng A; Lennard GR; León E; Lindholm T; Thi Linh T; Lopez G; Van Luot N; Mailhos A; Manesi Z; Martinez R; McKerchar SL; Meskó N; Misra G; Monaghan C; Mora EC; Moya-Garófano A; Musil B; Natividade JC; Niemczyk A; Nizharadze G; Oberzaucher E; Oleszkiewicz A; Omar-Fauzee MS; Onyishi IE; Özener B; Pagani AF; Pakalniskiene V; Parise M; Pazhoohi F; Pisanski A; Pisanski K; Ponciano E; Popa C; Prokop P; Rizwan M; Sainz M; Salkičević S; Sargautyte R; Sarmány-Schuller I; Schmehl S; Sharad S; Siddiqui RS; Simonetti F; Stoyanova SY; Tadinac M; Varella MAC; Vauclair CM; Vega LD; Widarini DA; Yoo G; Zaťková M; Zupančič M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16885. PubMed ID: 31729413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual orientation and shifts in preferences for a partner's body attributes in short-term versus long-term mating contexts.
    Lucas M; Koff E; Grossmith S; Migliorini R
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Jun; 108(3):699-710. PubMed ID: 21879616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "To Shave or Not to Shave": Pubic Hair Removal and Its Association with Relational and Sexual Satisfaction in Women and Men.
    Enzlin P; Bollen K; Prekatsounaki S; Hidalgo L; Aerts L; Deprest J
    J Sex Med; 2019 Jul; 16(7):954-962. PubMed ID: 31103484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is reading sexual intention truly functional? The impact of perceiving a partner's sexual intention on courtship initiation behaviors.
    Choi E; Hur T
    Arch Sex Behav; 2013 Nov; 42(8):1525-33. PubMed ID: 23864401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
    Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which are the male factors associated with female sexual dysfunction (FSD)?
    Maseroli E; Fanni E; Mannucci E; Fambrini M; Jannini EA; Maggi M; Vignozzi L
    Andrology; 2016 Sep; 4(5):911-20. PubMed ID: 27409983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding When a Partner Is Not in the Mood: Sexual Communal Strength in Couples Transitioning to Parenthood.
    Muise A; Kim JJ; Impett EA; Rosen NO
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Oct; 46(7):1993-2006. PubMed ID: 28324220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.