691 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20887140)
1. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Kretzer RM; Hu N; Umekoji H; Sciubba DM; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct; 13(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 20887140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative biomechanical analysis of spinal instability and instrumentation of the cervicothoracic junction: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Prybis BG; Tortolani PJ; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC; Cunningham BW
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 May; 20(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 17473645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs.
McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Xu R; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 19934991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Posterior-only stabilization of 2-column and 3-column injuries at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.
O'Brien JR; Dmitriev AE; Yu W; Gelb D; Ludwig S
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 19525789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Kretzer RM; Hsu W; Hu N; Umekoji H; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E778-85. PubMed ID: 22228326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanics of transvertebral screw fixation in the thoracic spine: an in vitro study.
Rodriguez-Martinez NG; Savardekar A; Nottmeier EW; Pirris S; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Mendes GA; Kalb S; Theodore N; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 27035506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical analysis of cervicothoracic junction osteotomy in cadaveric model of ankylosing spondylitis: effect of rod material and diameter.
Scheer JK; Tang JA; Deviren V; Acosta F; Buckley JM; Pekmezci M; McClellan RT; Ames CP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 21235305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical evaluation of a simulated T-9 burst fracture of the thoracic spine with an intact rib cage.
Perry TG; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; Francis T; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 24949903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selecting the lowest instrumented vertebra in a multilevel posterior cervical fusion across the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical investigation.
Gelfand Y; Franco D; Kinon MD; De la Garza Ramos R; Yassari R; Harris JA; Flamand S; McGuckin JP; Gonzalez JL; Mahoney JM; Bucklen BS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Mar; 38(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 36681959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation techniques after one-level laminectomy and facetectomy.
Eleraky M; Setzer M; Baaj AA; Papanastassiou I; Conrad BP; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Nov; 13(5):622-9. PubMed ID: 21039154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of pedicle and lateral mass screw construct stiffnesses at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.
Rhee JM; Kraiwattanapong C; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Nov; 30(21):E636-40. PubMed ID: 16261101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Kinetic analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion supplemented with transarticular facet screws.
Traynelis VC; Sherman J; Nottmeier E; Singh V; McGilvray K; Puttlitz CM; Leahy PD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 May; 20(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 24559463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation in spine tumors.
Mazel C; Hoffmann E; Antonietti P; Grunenwald D; Henry M; Williams J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jun; 29(11):1246-53. PubMed ID: 15167665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of transfacet screws to lateral mass screw-rod constructs in the lower cervical spine.
Tong J; Ji W; Zhou R; Huang Z; Liu S; Zhu Q
Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1787-93. PubMed ID: 26530298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study.
Hong JT; Tomoyuki T; Jain A; Orías AAE; Inoue N; An HS
Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2417-2424. PubMed ID: 28752245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Stand Alone Versus Facet Screw and Pedicle Screw Augmented Lateral Interbody Arthrodesis: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model.
Kretzer RM; Molina C; Hu N; Umekoji H; Baaj AA; Serhan H; Cunningham BW
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug; 29(7):E336-43. PubMed ID: 27137151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
