These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20887275)

  • 1. Optimal tests shrinking both means and variances applicable to microarray data analysis.
    Hwang JT; Liu P
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article36. PubMed ID: 20887275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved statistical tests for differential gene expression by shrinking variance components estimates.
    Cui X; Hwang JT; Qiu J; Blades NJ; Churchill GA
    Biostatistics; 2005 Jan; 6(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 15618528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
    Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Significance testing for small microarray experiments.
    Kooperberg C; Aragaki A; Strand AD; Olson JM
    Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2281-98. PubMed ID: 15889452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unequal group variances in microarray data analyses.
    Demissie M; Mascialino B; Calza S; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(9):1168-74. PubMed ID: 18344518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hierarchical Bayes models for cDNA microarray gene expression.
    Lönnstedt I; Britton T
    Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):279-91. PubMed ID: 15772106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An optimal test with maximum average power while controlling FDR with application to RNA-seq data.
    Si Y; Liu P
    Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):594-605. PubMed ID: 23889143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a statistical equivalence test applied to microarray data.
    Qiu J; Cui X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):240-66. PubMed ID: 20309757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of differentially expressed genes and false discovery rate in microarray studies.
    Gusnanto A; Calza S; Pawitan Y
    Curr Opin Lipidol; 2007 Apr; 18(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 17353668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical analysis of microarray data: a Bayesian approach.
    Gottardo R; Pannucci JA; Kuske CR; Brettin T
    Biostatistics; 2003 Oct; 4(4):597-620. PubMed ID: 14557114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Murthy KR; Michiels S; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3865-72. PubMed ID: 16105901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model selection based on FDR-thresholding optimizing the area under the ROC-curve.
    Graf AC; Bauer P
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article31. PubMed ID: 19572830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
    van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of differentially expressed gene sets in a partially paired microarray data set.
    Lim J; Kim J; Kim SC; Yu D; Kim K; Kim BS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Feb; 11(3):Article 5. PubMed ID: 22499704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The false discovery rate: a key concept in large-scale genetic studies.
    Chen JJ; Roberson PK; Schell MJ
    Cancer Control; 2010 Jan; 17(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 20010520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
    Liu P; Hwang JT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Supporting diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactive disorder with novelty detection.
    Lee HJ; Cho S; Shin MS
    Artif Intell Med; 2008 Mar; 42(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 18187311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size calculation through the incorporation of heteroscedasticity and dependence for a penalized t-statistic in microarray experiments.
    Hirakawa A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):260-75. PubMed ID: 22251173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.