These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20887351)

  • 1. Personality disorders and criminal responsibility in the Spanish supreme court.
    Mohíno S; Pujol A; Idiaquez I
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):150-4. PubMed ID: 20887351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forcible medication for courtroom competence--the case of Charles Sell.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2004 May; 350(22):2297-301. PubMed ID: 15163782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Queensland's Mental Health Court: the first 12 months.
    Lawrence JM
    Health Law Can; 2004 Apr; 24(3):47-59. PubMed ID: 15192939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Competency courts: a creative solution for restoring competency to the competency process.
    Finkle MJ; Kurth R; Cadle C; Mullan J
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(5):767-86. PubMed ID: 19784943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
    Klein DW
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Problems in forensic psychiatry--psychiatric evaluation of a criminal case with personality disorder].
    Nakajima T
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2008; 110(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 18446996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary treatment case or catalyst for change?
    Leong GB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):292-4. PubMed ID: 16186189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The reliability and validity of the rating scale of criminal responsibility for mentally disordered offenders.
    Cai W; Zhang Q; Huang F; Guan W; Tang T; Liu C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Mar; 236():146-50. PubMed ID: 24529786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forced medication of defendants to achieve trial competency: an update on the law after Sell.
    Hilgers K; Ramer P
    Georget J Leg Ethics; 2004; 17(4):813-26. PubMed ID: 15685765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
    Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
    Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Involuntary electro-convulsive therapy to restore competency to stand trial: a five year study in New York State.
    Ladds B
    J Forensic Sci; 1995 Mar; 40(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 7602274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond Dusky and Godinez: competency before and after trial.
    Perlin ML
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 12808692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The application of evaluation tools for criminal responsibility in forensic psychiatric expertise].
    Fu PX; Wang J; Shi TT; Hu JN; Zhu MX
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 26(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 20707283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Supreme Court limits permissible scope of government's ability to force medication of mentally ill defendants.
    Prieto-Gonzalez M
    J Law Med Ethics; 2003; 31(4):737-9. PubMed ID: 14968679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing competency competently: toward a rational standard for competency-to-stand-trial assessments.
    Morris GH; Haroun AM; Naimark D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):231-45. PubMed ID: 15515910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors associated with experts' opinions regarding criminal responsibility in The Netherlands.
    Barendregt M; Muller E; Nijman H; de Beurs E
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(5):619-31. PubMed ID: 18788082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Criminal madness: cultural iconography and insanity.
    Covey RD
    Stanford Law Rev; 2009 Apr; 61(6):1375-428. PubMed ID: 19489183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychiatry and the death penalty: the landmark Supreme Court cases and their ethical implications for the profession.
    Kermani EJ; Kantor JE
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 8193393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Criminal responsibility in schizophrenia with special attention to the mental state during the criminal act--a study based upon the activation-recurrence phenomenon].
    Higashi T
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2009; 111(7):762-88. PubMed ID: 19827562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.