These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2088789)

  • 1. Limitations of the digital image subtraction technique in assessing alveolar bone crest changes due to misalignment errors during image capture.
    Benn DK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 Aug; 19(3):97-104. PubMed ID: 2088789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of an internal standard in subtraction radiography to assess initial periodontal bone changes.
    Griffiths GS; Brägger U; Fourmousis I; Sterne JA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 9446977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
    J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis of digital subtraction images: in vivo error of the method and effect of thresholding.
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Fourmousis I; Schmid G; Schild U; Lang NP
    J Periodontol; 1998 Sep; 69(9):967-74. PubMed ID: 9776024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of contrast enhancement and pseudocolor transformation on the diagnosis with digital subtraction images (DSI).
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Marconi M; Häsler RU; Lang NP
    J Periodontal Res; 1994 Mar; 29(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 8158504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of three statistics for detecting differences in digitized dental radiographs: a simulation study.
    Cohen ME; Roddy WC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 8617392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analytical methodology in quantitative digital subtraction radiography: analyses of the aluminum reference wedge.
    Allen KM; Hausmann E
    J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1317-21. PubMed ID: 8997679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noise in subtraction images made from pairs of bitewing radiographs: a comparison between two subtraction programs.
    Haiter-Neto F; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Nov; 34(6):357-61. PubMed ID: 16227479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computerized generation of lesion models for evaluating subtraction radiography.
    Allen KM; Hausmann E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 Nov; 19(4):161-4. PubMed ID: 2097225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A precise receptor-positioning device for subtraction radiography, based on cross-arch stabilization.
    Couture RA; Dixon DA; Hildebolt CF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Jul; 34(4):231-6. PubMed ID: 15961598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pilot study: digital subtraction radiography as a tool to assess alveolar bone changes in periodontitis patients under treatment with subantimicrobial doses of doxycycline.
    Goren AD; Dunn SM; Wolff M; van der Stelt PF; Colosi DC; Golub LM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e40-5. PubMed ID: 18718780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of small angle discrepancies on interpretations of subtraction images.
    Davis M; Allen KM; Hausmann E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Sep; 78(3):397-400. PubMed ID: 7970605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What alveolar crest level on a bite-wing radiograph represents bone loss?
    Hausmann E; Allen K; Clerehugh V
    J Periodontol; 1991 Sep; 62(9):570-2. PubMed ID: 1941497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for the assessment of peri-implant bone change.
    Jeffcoat MK; Reddy MS; van den Berg HR; Bertens E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Mar; 3(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 1420723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnosis of alveolar bone changes with digital subtraction images and conventional radiographs. An in vitro study.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Nielsen PM; Lang NP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Aug; 72(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 1923405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital subtraction radiography for the assessment of changes in peri-implant bone density.
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Lang NP; Buser D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 1809671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative subtraction with direct digital dental radiography.
    Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H; Sasaki T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Sep; 26(5):286-94. PubMed ID: 9482001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bitewing-based alveolar bone densitometry: digital imaging resolution requirements.
    Hildebolt CF; Bartlett TQ; Brunsden BS; Hente NL; Gravier MJ; Walkup RK; Shrout MK; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Aug; 23(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 7835512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computerized methodology for detection of alveolar crestal bone loss from serial intraoral radiographs.
    Hausmann E; Allen K; Carpio L; Christersson LA; Clerehugh V
    J Periodontol; 1992 Aug; 63(8):657-62. PubMed ID: 1507045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.