These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20888618)

  • 1. Quantitative assessment of groundwater vulnerability using index system and transport simulation, Huangshuihe catchment, China.
    Yu C; Yao Y; Hayes G; Zhang B; Zheng C
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Nov; 408(24):6108-16. PubMed ID: 20888618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative assessment of intrinsic groundwater vulnerability to contamination using numerical simulations.
    Neukum C; Azzam R
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(2):245-54. PubMed ID: 19853887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Groundwater vulnerability assessment for the Banyas Catchment of the Syrian coastal area using GIS and the RISKE method.
    Kattaa B; Al-Fares W; Al Charideh AR
    J Environ Manage; 2010 May; 91(5):1103-10. PubMed ID: 20133034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrated risk assessment and screening analysis of drinking water safety of a conventional water supply system.
    Sun F; Chen J; Tong Q; Zeng S
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):47-56. PubMed ID: 17898443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vulnerability and risk evaluation of agricultural nitrogen pollution for Hungary's main aquifer using DRASTIC and GLEAMS models.
    Leone A; Ripa MN; Uricchio V; Deák J; Vargay Z
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2969-78. PubMed ID: 18054423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of threshold value in the use of statistical methods for groundwater vulnerability assessment.
    Masetti M; Sterlacchini S; Ballabio C; Sorichetta A; Poli S
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Jun; 407(12):3836-46. PubMed ID: 19345985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Groundwater environmental capacity and its evaluation index.
    Xing LT; Wu Q; Ye CH; Ye N
    Environ Monit Assess; 2010 Oct; 169(1-4):217-27. PubMed ID: 19763854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in the Yinchuan Plain, Northwest China using OREADIC.
    Qian H; Li P; Howard KW; Yang C; Zhang X
    Environ Monit Assess; 2012 Jun; 184(6):3613-28. PubMed ID: 21773864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial variations of storm runoff pollution and their correlation with land-use in a rapidly urbanizing catchment in China.
    Qin HP; Khu ST; Yu XY
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(20):4613-23. PubMed ID: 20667581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Well vulnerability: a quantitative approach for source water protection.
    Frind EO; Molson JW; Rudolph DL
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(5):732-42. PubMed ID: 16961495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Net flux of pollutants at a reduced spatial scale--an index of catchment vulnerability.
    Yillia PT; Kreuzinger N
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 19151492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk assessment and prioritisation of contaminated sites on the catchment scale.
    Troldborg M; Lemming G; Binning PJ; Tuxen N; Bjerg PL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Oct; 101(1-4):14-28. PubMed ID: 18768238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of groundwater vulnerability maps obtained through statistical methods.
    Sorichetta A; Masetti M; Ballabio C; Sterlacchini S; Beretta GP
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Apr; 92(4):1215-24. PubMed ID: 21208723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stochastic analysis to assess the spatial distribution of groundwater nitrate concentrations in the Po catchment (Italy).
    Cinnirella S; Buttafuoco G; Pirrone N
    Environ Pollut; 2005 Feb; 133(3):569-80. PubMed ID: 15519731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of a numerical indicator of microbial contamination for karst springs.
    Butscher C; Auckenthaler A; Scheidler S; Huggenberger P
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 20180864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhanced vulnerability assessment in karst areas by combining mapping with modeling approaches.
    Butscher C; Huggenberger P
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Jan; 407(3):1153-63. PubMed ID: 18962828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting the vulnerability of reservoirs to poor water quality and cyanobacterial blooms.
    Leigh C; Burford MA; Roberts DT; Udy JW
    Water Res; 2010 Aug; 44(15):4487-96. PubMed ID: 20598731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping using GIS, modeling and a fuzzy logic tool.
    Nobre RC; Rotunno Filho OC; Mansur WJ; Nobre MM; Cosenza CA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Dec; 94(3-4):277-92. PubMed ID: 17728007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan.
    Babiker IS; Mohamed MA; Hiyama T; Kato K
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Jun; 345(1-3):127-40. PubMed ID: 15919534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nitrogen fluxes on catchment scale: the influence of hydrological aspects.
    Zessner M; Schilling Ch; Gabriel O; Heinecke U
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(9):163-73. PubMed ID: 16445185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.