These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20888629)

  • 1. Round robin test: wear of nine dental restorative materials in six different wear simulators - supplement to the round robin test of 2005.
    Heintze SD; Barkmeier WW; Latta MA; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):e1-9. PubMed ID: 20888629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators--results of a round robin test.
    Heintze SD; Zappini G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):304-17. PubMed ID: 15766577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Forjanic M; Zellweger G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1051-62. PubMed ID: 16386293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Esthetic restorative materials and opposing enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Marques MM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 18505225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-body wear of resin denture teeth with and without nanofillers.
    Stober T; Henninger M; Schmitter M; Pritsch M; Rammelsberg P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 20141815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two methods for measuring generalized wear of dental materials.
    Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1994 Dec; 34():1-8. PubMed ID: 8935088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wear of resin denture teeth by two-body contact.
    Stober T; Lutz T; Gilde H; Rammelsberg P
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 16084585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists.
    Stawarczyk B; Özcan M; Trottmann A; Schmutz F; Roos M; Hämmerle C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 23684283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of surface treatment on orthodontic bonding to amalgam.
    Skilton JW; Tyas MJ; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 16792246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress distribution on the metal framework of the implant-supported fixed prosthesis using different veneering materials.
    Ciftçi Y; Canay S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 12066633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-body wear resistance and degree of conversion of laboratory-processed composite materials.
    Knobloch LA; Kerby RE; Seghi R; van Putten M
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 10709525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of erosive pH cycling on different restorative materials and on enamel restored with these materials.
    Francisconi LF; Honório HM; Rios D; Magalhães AC; Machado MA; Buzalaf MA
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18435196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chairside repair of worn or lost denture teeth using nanofilled composite resin bonded to the denture base.
    Renne W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 20141818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of microabrasion on restorative materials and tooth surface.
    Chan DC; Lemke KC; Howell ML; Barghi N
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 8957920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
    Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In situ effect of an erosive challenge on different restorative materials and on enamel adjacent to these materials.
    Rios D; Honório HM; Francisconi LF; Magalhães AC; de Andrade Moreira Machado MA; Buzalaf MA
    J Dent; 2008 Feb; 36(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 18191012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Zellweger G; Büchler A; Zappini G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.