345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20888929)
1. Phase II cancer clinical trials with a one-sample log-rank test and its corrections based on the Edgeworth expansion.
Sun X; Peng P; Tu D
Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Jan; 32(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 20888929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Designing phase II studies in cancer with time-to-event endpoints.
Owzar K; Jung SH
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):209-21. PubMed ID: 18559409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A two-stage phase II trial design utilizing both primary and secondary endpoints.
Lin X; Allred R; Andrews G
Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 17252536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical methods for a phase II oncology trial with a growth modulation index (GMI) endpoint.
Kovalchik S; Mietlowski W
Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Jan; 32(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 20920605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One- and two-stage designs for stratified phase II clinical trials.
London WB; Chang MN
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(17):2597-611. PubMed ID: 16118809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-stage designs for dose-finding trials with a biologic endpoint using stepwise tests.
Polley MY; Cheung YK
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):232-41. PubMed ID: 17573866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Group-sequential methods for adaptive seamless phase II/III clinical trials.
Stallard N
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):787-801. PubMed ID: 21516569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An adjustment for patient heterogeneity in the design of two-stage phase II trials.
Sposto R; Gaynon PS
Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2566-79. PubMed ID: 19521973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-stage designs for phase II cancer trials with ordinal responses.
Stallard N; Cockey L
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Nov; 29(6):896-904. PubMed ID: 18703164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exact two-stage designs for phase II activity trials with rank-based endpoints.
Wilding GE; Shan G; Hutson AD
Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Mar; 33(2):332-41. PubMed ID: 22074983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal and minimax three-stage designs for phase II oncology clinical trials.
Chen K; Shan M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jan; 29(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17544337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving the design of phase II trials of cytostatic anticancer agents.
Stone A; Wheeler C; Barge A
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 16843736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative evaluation of single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials.
Pond GR; Abbasi S
Clin Trials; 2011 Jun; 8(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 21511687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Curtailed two-stage designs with two dependent binary endpoints.
Chen CM; Chi Y
Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 22162348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A flexible multi-stage design for phase II oncology trials.
Tan MT; Xiong X
Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 22328328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sample size calculation for the one-sample log-rank test.
Schmidt R; Kwiecien R; Faldum A; Berthold F; Hero B; Ligges S
Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(6):1031-40. PubMed ID: 25500942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Llovet JM; Di Bisceglie AM; Bruix J; Kramer BS; Lencioni R; Zhu AX; Sherman M; Schwartz M; Lotze M; Talwalkar J; Gores GJ;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):698-711. PubMed ID: 18477802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian predictive power for interim adaptation in seamless phase II/III trials where the endpoint is survival up to some specified timepoint.
Schmidli H; Bretz F; Racine-Poon A
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4925-38. PubMed ID: 17590875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal two-stage designs allowing flexibility in number of subjects for phase II clinical trials.
Masaki N; Koyama T; Yoshimura I; Hamada C
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Jul; 19(4):721-31. PubMed ID: 20183436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sample size computation for two-sample noninferiority log-rank test.
Jung SH; Kang SJ; McCall LM; Blumenstein B
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):969-79. PubMed ID: 16279355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
