These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20889035)

  • 21. Introducing and assessing the efficacy of a novel method to reduce enamel damage after orthodontic bracket removal using two herbal-based resin colouring agents: An in vitro study.
    Ahrari F; Ramezanian N; Ahmadi Z; Mohammadipour HS
    Int Orthod; 2023 Jun; 21(2):100744. PubMed ID: 36857845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements.
    Krell KV; Courey JM; Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8456784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of buccal versus lingual surfaces, enamel conditioning procedures and storage duration on brackets debonding characteristics.
    Brosh T; Strouthou S; Sarne O
    J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15683890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three-dimensional quantification of adhesive remnants on teeth after debonding.
    Lee YK; Lim YK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):556-62. PubMed ID: 18929274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Physical and adhesive properties of dental enamel after radiotherapy and bonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Santin GC; Palma-Dibb RG; Romano FL; de Oliveira HF; Nelson Filho P; de Queiroz AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 26232837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does ultra-pulse CO(2) laser reduce the risk of enamel damage during debonding of ceramic brackets?
    Ahrari F; Heravi F; Fekrazad R; Farzanegan F; Nakhaei S
    Lasers Med Sci; 2012 May; 27(3):567-74. PubMed ID: 21667137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
    Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Occurrence and severity of enamel decalcification adjacent to bracket bases and sub-bracket lesions during orthodontic treatment with two different lingual appliances.
    Knösel M; Klang E; Helms HJ; Wiechmann D
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Oct; 38(5):485-92. PubMed ID: 26420772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interlayer formation and its effect on debonding polycrystalline alumina orthodontic brackets.
    Sinha PK; Rohrer MD; Nanda RS; Brickman CD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Nov; 108(5):455-63. PubMed ID: 7484964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Orthodontic bonding with self-etching primer and self-adhesive systems.
    Chu CH; Ou KL; Dong de R; Huang HM; Tsai HH; Wang WN
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 33(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 20729403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ceramic bracket debonding: the evaluation of two debonding techniques and their effect on enamel.
    Amditis C
    Aust Orthod J; 1994 Mar; 13(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 7993241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative study of dental enamel loss after debonding braces by analytical scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
    Rodríguez-Chávez JA; Arenas-Alatorre J; Belio-Reyes IA
    Microsc Res Tech; 2017 Jul; 80(7):680-686. PubMed ID: 28161895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vivo debonding strength and enamel damage in two orthodontic debonding methods.
    Brosh T; Kaufman A; Balabanovsky A; Vardimon AD
    J Biomech; 2005 May; 38(5):1107-13. PubMed ID: 15797592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study.
    Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):478. PubMed ID: 37443027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Finite element sub-modeling analyses of damage to enamel at the incisor enamel/adhesive interface upon de-bonding for different orthodontic bracket bases.
    Lin CL; Huang SF; Tsai HC; Chang WJ
    J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 20833397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.
    Liu JK; Chung CH; Chang CY; Shieh DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):761-5; quiz 802. PubMed ID: 16360918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-dimensional measurement of residual adhesive and enamel loss on teeth after debonding of orthodontic brackets: an in-vitro study.
    Al Shamsi AH; Cunningham JL; Lamey PJ; Lynch E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):301.e9-15. PubMed ID: 17346580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Histologic investigation of the human pulp after thermodebonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Jost-Brinkmann PG; Stein H; Miethke RR; Nakata M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Nov; 102(5):410-7. PubMed ID: 1476106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study.
    Zarrinnia K; Eid NM; Kehoe MJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):284-93. PubMed ID: 7661146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.