These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20889116)

  • 21. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers.
    Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 20429764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Heart scanner 'min dae'?
    du Swartzberg J
    S Afr Med J; 1998 May; 88(5):571, 574. PubMed ID: 9638129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Image can be reversed between scout and axial views on Elscint CT Twin and Helicat computed tomography scanners.
    Health Devices; 1998 Dec; 27(12):445-7. PubMed ID: 9990514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is hybridic positron emission tomography/computerized tomography the only option? The future of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging.
    Grammaticos P; Zerva C; Asteriadis I; Trontzos C; Hatziioannou K
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2007; 10(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 17684579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Selecting a CT scanner for cardiac imaging: the heart of the matter.
    Lewis MA; Pascoal A; Keevil SF; Lewis CA
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 89(1065):20160376. PubMed ID: 27302494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. PET performance measurements for an LSO-based combined PET/CT scanner using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 standard.
    Erdi YE; Nehmeh SA; Mulnix T; Humm JL; Watson CC
    J Nucl Med; 2004 May; 45(5):813-21. PubMed ID: 15136631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sensitivity and daily quality control of a mobile PET/CT scanner operating in 3-dimensional mode.
    Belakhlef A; Church C; Fraser R; Lakhanpal S
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2007 Dec; 35(4):229-31. PubMed ID: 18006593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Investment and operating costs of the electron beam scanner at the Broussais Hospital].
    Perrin JP
    J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 75(12):663-7. PubMed ID: 7861354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Dosimetry comparison of pelvimetry methods using conventional radiologic technic and x-ray scanner].
    Germond M; Raimondi S; Schnyder P; de Grandi P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1989; 18(8):1002-6. PubMed ID: 2621327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What Is the CT Dose Check Standard, and Why Do CT Scanners Need to Be in Compliance?
    Mahesh M
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Jan; 13(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 26653798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. CT scanner design and patient radiation exposure.
    Brody AS
    Pediatr Radiol; 2002 Apr; 32(4):268-71. PubMed ID: 11956708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dedicated CT scanner in an emergency department: quantification of factors that contribute to lack of use.
    Nuñez DB; Ledbetter MS; Farrell L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):859-62. PubMed ID: 12239024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computed tomography: the most important advancement in radiography since the discovery of x-rays.
    Stanley JH
    Stand News; 1995 Jan; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 10160504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preparing for the costs of XR-29 a new standard for CT radiation dose monitoring.
    Sferrella SM
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2015 Oct; 69(10):38-41. PubMed ID: 26595974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of correlated dose and sensitivity profiles on a multi-slice CT scanner.
    Bahar Gogani J; Hägglund P; Wickman G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):332-6. PubMed ID: 15933132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of the CT scatter fractions provided in NCRP Report No. 147 to scanner-specific scatter fractions and the consequences for calculated barrier thickness.
    Larson SC; Goodsitt MM; Christodoulou EG; Larson LS
    Health Phys; 2007 Aug; 93(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 17622822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dose reduction opportunities for CT scanners.
    Toth TL
    Pediatr Radiol; 2002 Apr; 32(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 11956707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multidetector CT: opportunities, challenges, and concerns associated with scanners with 64 or more detector rows.
    Boone JM
    Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):334-7. PubMed ID: 17057062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improving CT scan capabilities with a new trauma workflow concept: simulation of hospital logistics using different CT scanner scenarios.
    Fung Kon Jin PH; Dijkgraaf MG; Alons CL; van Kuijk C; Beenen LF; Koole GM; Goslings JC
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):504-9. PubMed ID: 20227215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mobile technology in rural hospitals: the case of the CT scanner.
    Hartley D; Moscovice I; Christianson J
    Health Serv Res; 1996 Jun; 31(2):213-34. PubMed ID: 8675440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.