These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

658 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20890884)

  • 1. Comparing applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in glaucomatous and ocular hypertensive eyes.
    Marini M; Da Pozzo S; Accardo A; Canziani T
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 20890884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
    Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
    Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
    Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
    Sahin A; Niyaz L; Yildirim N
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007; 35(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 17539785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.
    Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children.
    Feng CS; Jin KW; Yi K; Choi DG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 160(5):937-943.e1. PubMed ID: 26210864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeatability and accuracy of applanation resonance tonometry in healthy subjects and patients with glaucoma.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 92(1):e66-73. PubMed ID: 23837834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical use of a new position-independent rebound tonometer.
    Jablonski KS; Rosentreter A; Gaki S; Lappas A; Dietlein TS
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):763-7. PubMed ID: 23172572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness.
    Poostchi A; Mitchell R; Nicholas S; Purdie G; Wells A
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 37(7):687-91. PubMed ID: 19788665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
    Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of IcareONE rebound tonometer for self-measuring intraocular pressure.
    Sakamoto M; Kanamori A; Fujihara M; Yamada Y; Nakamura M; Negi A
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 92(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 23586927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of refractive errors on IOP measurement by rebound tonometry (ICare) and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Avitabile T; Longo A; Rocca D; Amato R; Gagliano C; Castaing M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 248(4):585-91. PubMed ID: 19727794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
    Salim S; Du H; Wan J
    J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 23542696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.
    Barleon L; Hoffmann EM; Berres M; Pfeiffer N; Grus FH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 142(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 17011849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
    Halkiadakis I; Patsea E; Chatzimichali K; Skouriotis S; Chalkidou S; Amariotakis G; Papakonstadinou D; Theodossiadis G; Amariotakis A; Georgopoulos G
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new rebound tonometer for home monitoring of intraocular pressure.
    Rosentreter A; Jablonski KS; Mellein AC; Gaki S; Hueber A; Dietlein TS
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 249(11):1713-9. PubMed ID: 21842435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.