BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2090158)

  • 1. Comparison between the counter-rotational toothbrush and multi-action toothbrush.
    McKinney J; Burns S; Killoy W
    J Clin Dent; 1990; 2(2):39-42. PubMed ID: 2090158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of irrigation to floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing: effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and supragingival plaque.
    Barnes CM; Russell CM; Reinhardt RA; Payne JB; Lyle DM
    J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(3):71-7. PubMed ID: 16305005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.
    Sowinski J; Petrone DM; Wachs GN; Chaknis P; Kemp J; Sprosta AA; Devizio W
    Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):339-45. PubMed ID: 19146124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relative effectiveness of six powered toothbrushes for dental plaque removal.
    Biesbrock AR; Walters PA; Bartizek RD
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):198-202. PubMed ID: 12518489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study of gingival irritation and plaque removal following a three-minute toothbrushing.
    Yankell SL; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 5(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 8031483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The comparative plaque removal efficacy of two advanced manual toothbrush designs in two independent clinical studies.
    Singh SM; Battista GW; Rustogi KN; DeVizio W; Volpe AR; Petrone ME; Proskin HM
    J Clin Dent; 2001; 12(3):83-6. PubMed ID: 11505966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative efficacy of a new battery-powered toothbrush and a commercially available manual toothbrush on the removal of established supragingival plaque: a single-use crossover study in adults.
    Singh S; Rustogi KN; Chaknis P; Petrone ME; DeVizio W; Proskin HM
    J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 16170978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A split-mouth comparison of a three-dimensional-action electric toothbrush and a high-frequency electric toothbrush for reducing plaque and gingivitis.
    Putt MS; Milleman JL; Davidson KR; Kleber CJ; Cugini M
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 3(4):95-103. PubMed ID: 12666948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Plaque removal efficacy of a new experimental battery-powered toothbrush relative to two advanced-design manual toothbrushes.
    Haun J; Williams K; Friesen L; Ferrante A; Walters PA; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):191-7. PubMed ID: 12518488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A 3-month clinical comparison of the safety and efficacy of two battery-operated toothbrushes: the Braun Oral-B Battery toothbrush and the Colgate Actibrush.
    Putt MS; Milleman JL; Davidson KR; Cugini M; Warren PR
    Am J Dent; 2001 Nov; 14 Spec No():13B-17B. PubMed ID: 12003482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness.
    Cugini M; Thompson M; Warren PR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):1-9. PubMed ID: 17091134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of powered and manual toothbrushes for plaque removal by 4- to 5-year-old children.
    Silverman J; Rosivack RG; Matheson PB; Houpt MI
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 15185803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparative effectiveness of the Interplak electric rotary toothbrush].
    De Beule F; Bercy P
    J Parodontol; 1990 Feb; 9(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 2384876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the clinical effects and gingival abrasion aspects of manual and electric toothbrushes.
    Mantokoudis D; Joss A; Christensen MM; Meng HX; Suvan JE; Lang NP
    J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Jan; 28(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11142669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Plaque removal efficacy of a prototype power toothbrush compared to a positive control manual toothbrush.
    Williams K; Haun J; Dockter K; Ferrante A; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 14579873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blinded clinical evaluation of a new manual toothbrush.
    Harpenau L; Meyers G; Lyon C; Chambers D; Lundergan W
    J Clin Dent; 2006; 17(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 16838873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dental plaque removal efficacy of a battery-powered toothbrush vs. a control Japanese manual toothbrush.
    Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    Am J Dent; 2002 Sep; 15 Spec No():33A-36A. PubMed ID: 12512990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative efficacy of the Colgate Actibrush battery-powered toothbrush vs Oral-B CrossAction toothbrush on established plaque and gingivitis: a 6-week clinical study.
    Nathoo S; Rustogi KN; Petrone ME; DeVizio W; Zhang YP; Volpe AR; Proskin HM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 2000; (31):S19-24; quiz S35. PubMed ID: 11908371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of the effects of a sonic toothbrush with ultrasound waveguide in disrupting plaque with and without bristle contact.
    Biesbrock AR; He T; Walters PA; Bartizek RD
    Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 18578173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical comparison of plaque removal and gingival bleeding reduction by two different brush heads on a sonic toothbrush.
    Harpenau L
    J Clin Dent; 2000; 11(2):29-34. PubMed ID: 11460280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.