These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2090760)

  • 21. Epicardial versus parietal pericardial defibrillation.
    Rubin L; Hudson P
    Am J Emerg Med; 1985 Mar; 3(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 3970772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Epicardial activation after unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in dogs.
    Shibata N; Chen PS; Dixon EG; Wolf PD; Danieley ND; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Am J Physiol; 1988 Oct; 255(4 Pt 2):H902-9. PubMed ID: 3177679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison between two versus three patches single pulse shock defibrillation in pigs.
    Montenero AS; Bombardieri G; Barilaro C; Di Francesco P; Bertazzoni S; Santarelli P; Pisanó E; Alessandrini F; Possati G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Feb; 14(2 Pt 2):362-5. PubMed ID: 1706853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A direct comparison of epicardial and nonthoracotomy defibrillation using monophasic and biphasic shocks.
    Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Chapman PD; Wetherbee JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jan; 18(1 Pt 1):70-4. PubMed ID: 7700834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Order in disorder: effect of barium on ventricular fibrillation.
    Dorian P; Penkoske PA; Witkowski FX
    Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 12(4):399-406. PubMed ID: 8608459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Novel electrode design for potentially painless internal defibrillation also allows for successful external defibrillation.
    Jayanti V; Zviman MM; Nazarian S; Halperin HR; Berger RD
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Sep; 18(10):1095-100. PubMed ID: 17711432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Direct comparison of monophasic, biphasic and sequential pulse defibrillation over a single current pathway.
    Thakur R; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN
    Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 12(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 8608460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relationship between "extension of refractoriness" and probability of successful defibrillation.
    Tovar OH; Jones JL
    Am J Physiol; 1997 Feb; 272(2 Pt 2):H1011-9. PubMed ID: 9124409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Direct current application: easy induction of ventricular fibrillation for the determination of the defibrillation threshold in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
    Weismüller P; Richter P; Binner L; Grossmann G; Hemmer W; Höher M; Kochs M; Hombach V
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Aug; 15(8):1137-43. PubMed ID: 1381081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of pulse separation between two sequential biphasic shocks given over different lead configurations on ventricular defibrillation efficacy.
    Johnson EE; Alferness CA; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2267-74. PubMed ID: 1591840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electrophysiological background of individual variability in electrical defibrillation efficacy.
    Murakawa Y; Yamashita T; Ajiki K; Sezaki K; Kanese Y; Omata M
    Am J Physiol; 1996 Sep; 271(3 Pt 2):H1094-8. PubMed ID: 8853346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Azimilide decreases defibrillation voltage requirements and increases spatial organization during ventricular fibrillation.
    Qi XQ; Newman D; Dorian P
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Mar; 3(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 10354978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Overlapping sequential pulses. A new waveform for transthoracic defibrillation.
    Kerber RE; Spencer KT; Kallok MJ; Birkett C; Smith R; Yoerger D; Kieso RA
    Circulation; 1994 May; 89(5):2369-79. PubMed ID: 8181163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The shape of high-voltage impulse and the effect of defibrillation].
    Moroz VV; Bogushevich MS; Vostrikov VA; Kozlova EK; Chernysh AM
    Anesteziol Reanimatol; 2002; (6):60-3. PubMed ID: 12611162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of lidocaine on the vulnerable period during ventricular fibrillation.
    Cha YM; Peters BB; Chen PS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Jul; 5(7):571-80. PubMed ID: 7987527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tunnel propagation following defibrillation with ICD shocks: hidden postshock activations in the left ventricular wall underlie isoelectric window.
    Constantino J; Long Y; Ashihara T; Trayanova NA
    Heart Rhythm; 2010 Jul; 7(7):953-61. PubMed ID: 20348028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of shock strengths on ventricular defibrillation failure.
    Chattipakorn N; Banville I; Gray RA; Ideker RE
    Cardiovasc Res; 2004 Jan; 61(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 14732200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Recurrent appearance of protective zones after an unsuccessful defibrillation shock.
    Hwang C; Fan W; Chen PS
    Am J Physiol; 1996 Oct; 271(4 Pt 2):H1491-7. PubMed ID: 8897944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prediction of defibrillation outcome by epicardial activation patterns following shocks near the defibrillation threshold.
    Chattipakorn N; Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Sep; 11(9):1014-21. PubMed ID: 11021472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Initial clinical experience with endocardial defibrillation using an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator with a triple-electrode system.
    Saksena S; Tullo NG; Krol RB; Mauro AM
    Arch Intern Med; 1989 Oct; 149(10):2333-9. PubMed ID: 2802898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.