BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2090888)

  • 1. A comparative study of two methods for the isolation of human leucocytes for DNA extraction.
    Lim LH; Ton SH; Cheong SK
    Malays J Pathol; 1990 Jun; 12(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 2090888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Blood fractionation based on the extraction of the buffy-coat layer. Analysis of our results].
    Algora M; Torres P; Rodríguez MA; de la Calle C; Biurrún M; Nieto S; Ruiz M; Alonso MV
    Sangre (Barc); 1995 Apr; 40(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 7784953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Isolation of restrictible DNA.
    Topić E; Gluhak J
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1991 May; 29(5):327-30. PubMed ID: 1892954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High salt method: a simple and rapid procedure for isolation of genomic DNA from buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) white blood cells.
    Aravindakshan TV; Nainar AM; Nachimuthu K
    Indian J Exp Biol; 1997 Aug; 35(8):903-5. PubMed ID: 9475068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Analysis of the quality of hemoderivatives obtained using a buffy-coat extraction system with a top-and-bottom technique (Optipress II)].
    Hurtado C; Bonanad S; Soler MA; Mirabet V; Blasco I; Planelles MD; de Miguel A
    Sangre (Barc); 1999 Oct; 44(5):319-26. PubMed ID: 10618907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biostorage and quality control for human peripheral blood leukocytes.
    Zhou J; Wu J; Zhao X; Shen W; Liu X; Xu C; Jin H
    Biopreserv Biobank; 2015 Feb; 13(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 25686042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technical note: Comparative analyses of the quality and yield of genomic DNA from invasive and noninvasive, automated and manual extraction methods.
    Foley C; O'Farrelly C; Meade KG
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jun; 94(6):3159-65. PubMed ID: 21605785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A column purification procedure for the removal of leucocytes from parasite-infected bovine blood.
    Ambrosio RE; Potgieter FT; Nel N
    Onderstepoort J Vet Res; 1986 Sep; 53(3):179-80. PubMed ID: 3763171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of mitochondrial DNA copy number: pre-analytical factors.
    Andreu AL; Martinez R; Marti R; García-Arumí E
    Mitochondrion; 2009 Jul; 9(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 19272467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of three different mycobacterial DNA isolation methods].
    Alp A; Alp S; Saribaş Z; Hasçelik G
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2007 Jul; 41(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 17933250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Production of leucocyte poor blood. A comparison of five different methods.
    Grunnet N; Rasmussen NJ
    Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1981; 64():106-11. PubMed ID: 6959257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of extraction methods. The kind of organ samples and the examination delay on the DNA yields and typing.
    Atmadja DS; Tatsuno Y; Ueno Y; Nishimura A
    Kobe J Med Sci; 1995 Dec; 41(6):197-211. PubMed ID: 8869006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PCR of immobilized DNA molecules isolated from human blood cells by a non-enzymatic method.
    Suárez VM; Clarke DH; López-Canovas L; Riverón AM
    Prep Biochem Biotechnol; 2008; 38(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 18080909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pellet pestle homogenization of agarose gel slices at 45 degrees C for deoxyribonucleic acid extraction.
    Kurien BT; Kaufman KM; Harley JB; Scofield RH
    Anal Biochem; 2001 Sep; 296(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 11554710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Separation methods for isolation of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes affect their motile activity.
    Sroka J; Kordecka A; Włosiak P; Madeja Z; Korohoda W
    Eur J Cell Biol; 2009 Sep; 88(9):531-9. PubMed ID: 19560229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of RNA yield from small cell populations sorted by flow cytometry applying different isolation procedures.
    Mack E; Neubauer A; Brendel C
    Cytometry A; 2007 Jun; 71(6):404-9. PubMed ID: 17431883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of methods for isolation of DNA from slowly and rapidly growing mycobacteria.
    Zhang ZQ; Ishaque M
    Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis; 1997 Dec; 65(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 9465157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two methods for assaying DNA double-strand break repair in mammalian cells by asymmetric field inversion gel electrophoresis.
    Stamato T; Guerriero S; Denko N
    Radiat Res; 1993 Jan; 133(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 8434114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-laboratory evaluation of procedures for reducing the volume of cord blood: influence on cell recoveries.
    Takahashi TA; Rebulla P; Armitage S; van Beckhoven J; Eichler H; Kekomäki R; Letowska M; Wahab F; Moroff G
    Cytotherapy; 2006; 8(3):254-64. PubMed ID: 16793734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improvement in isolation of human peripheral blood leukocyte subpopulations: application in diagnosing human cytomegalovirus infection in bone marrow transplant patients.
    Behzad-Behbahani A; Yaghobi R; Sabahi F; Rostaei MH; Alborzi A
    Exp Clin Transplant; 2005 Jun; 3(1):316-9. PubMed ID: 15989676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.