These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2091165)

  • 1. Evaluation of compatibility effects in the precuing of arm and direction parameters.
    Dornier LA; Reeve TG
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1990 Mar; 61(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 2091165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unified nature of bimanual movements revealed by separating the preparation of each arm.
    Blinch J; Franks IM; Carpenter MG; Chua R
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jun; 233(6):1931-44. PubMed ID: 25850406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions.
    Goodman D; Kelso JA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Dec; 109(4):475-95. PubMed ID: 6449532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Top-down attentional control for distractor locations: the benefit of precuing distractor locations on target localization and discrimination.
    Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):303-16. PubMed ID: 20364920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age differences in using precued information to preprogram interception of a ball.
    Olivier I; Ripoll H; Audiffren M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Aug; 85(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 9293568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The acquisition of task-specific productions and modifications of declarative representations in spatial-precuing tasks.
    Proctor RW; Reeve TG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1988 Jun; 117(2):182-96. PubMed ID: 2969034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus-response compatibility and response preparation: effects on motor component of information processing for upper and lower limb responses.
    Kato Y; Endo H; Kizuka T; Asami T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Dec; 101(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 16491672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus-response compatibility for absolute and relative spatial correspondence in reaching and in button pressing.
    Stins JF; Michaels CF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):569-89. PubMed ID: 10881619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of spatial movement components precues on the execution of rapid aiming in children aged 7, 9, and 11.
    Olivier I; Bard C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2000 Oct; 77(2):155-68. PubMed ID: 11017723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Representing response position relative to display location: influence on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Jul; 58(5):839-64. PubMed ID: 16194938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of mental representation for same and mixed compatibility assignments.
    Dornier LA; Gilmour Reeve T
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Jan; 58(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 8668519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent.
    Rosenbaum DA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Dec; 109(4):444-74. PubMed ID: 6449531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parameter precuing and motor preparation.
    Anson JG; Hyland BI; Kötter R; Wickens JR
    Motor Control; 2000 Apr; 4(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 11500576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age differences in the maintenance and restructuring of movement preparation.
    Amrhein PC; Stelmach GE; Goggin NL
    Psychol Aging; 1991 Sep; 6(3):451-66. PubMed ID: 1930762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues.
    Brass M; Bekkering H; Wohlschläger A; Prinz W
    Brain Cogn; 2000 Nov; 44(2):124-43. PubMed ID: 11041986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reaction time methods in the study of motor programming: the precuing of hand, digit, and duration.
    Zelaznik HN; Hahn R
    J Mot Behav; 1985 Jun; 17(2):190-218. PubMed ID: 15140691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beneficial effects of ambiguous precues: parallel motor preparation or reduced premotoric processing time?
    Jentzsch I; Leuthold H; Richard Ridderinkhof K
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Mar; 41(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 15032988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Difference in stimulus-response compatibility effect in premotor and motor time between upper and lower limbs.
    Kato Y; Asami T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):939-46. PubMed ID: 9885062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Movement specification time with age.
    Stelmach GE; Goggin NL; Garcia-Colera A
    Exp Aging Res; 1987; 13(1-2):39-46. PubMed ID: 3678350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.