These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2091165)

  • 21. Effects of allocation of visuo-spatial attention to visual stimuli triggering unilateral arm abduction on anticipatory postural control.
    Tomita H; Fujiwara K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 119(9):2086-97. PubMed ID: 18620907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evidence of direction loss in elderly movement preparation is not due to spatial orienting effects.
    Amrhein PC; Von Dras D; Anderson M
    Exp Aging Res; 1993; 19(1):71-95. PubMed ID: 8444268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses.
    Reeve TG; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Aug; 10(4):541-53. PubMed ID: 6235318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of response grouping on free-choice decision making in a response selection task.
    Khan MA; Mourton S; Buckolz E; Adam JJ; Hayes AE
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jun; 134(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 20188342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enhancement of the Simon effect by response precuing.
    Proctor RW; Lu CH; Van Zandt T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1992 Oct; 81(1):53-74. PubMed ID: 1456080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Preparation of response force and movement direction: onset effects on the lateralized readiness potential.
    Müller-Gethmann H; Rinkenauer G; Stahl J; Ulrich R
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Jul; 37(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 10934909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Precuing an isolated stimulus temporarily outweighs in-stream stimulus facilitation.
    Hommuk K; Bachmann T; Oja A
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Apr; 135(2):167-81. PubMed ID: 18507316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transfer of orthogonal stimulus-response mappings to an orthogonal Simon task.
    Bae GY; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Apr; 62(4):746-65. PubMed ID: 18780263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dissociating visual attention and effector selection in spatial precuing tasks.
    Adam JJ; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1092-106. PubMed ID: 15584817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influences of presentation mode and time pressure on the utilisation of advance information in response preparation.
    Sangals J; Sommer W; Leuthold H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2002 Jan; 109(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 11766138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A meta-analysis of the facilitation of arm flexion and extension movements as a function of stimulus valence.
    Laham SM; Kashima Y; Dix J; Wheeler M
    Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(6):1069-90. PubMed ID: 25345558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Apr; 57(3):539-56. PubMed ID: 15204140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is direction position? Position- and direction-based correspondence effects in tasks with moving stimuli.
    Bosbach S; Prinz W; Kerzel D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Apr; 58(3):467-506. PubMed ID: 16025758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of response eccentricity and relative position on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility with joystick and keypress responses.
    Proctor RW; Cho YS
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Feb; 56(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 12613566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The preparation of aiming movements.
    Carson RG; Chua R; Goodman D; Byblow WD; Elliott D
    Brain Cogn; 1995 Jul; 28(2):133-54. PubMed ID: 7546669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Are automatic imitation and spatial compatibility mediated by different processes?
    Cooper RP; Catmur C; Heyes C
    Cogn Sci; 2013; 37(4):605-30. PubMed ID: 22578089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Insights into the control of arm movement during body motion as revealed by EMG analyses.
    Blouin J; Guillaud E; Bresciani JP; Guerraz M; Simoneau M
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1309():40-52. PubMed ID: 19883633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Spatial stimulus-response compatibility: presentation of stimuli within one visual hemifield].
    Nicoletti R; Anzola GP; Rizzolatti G; Umiltà C
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1980 Jul; 56(13):1426-31. PubMed ID: 7448039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Set- and Element-Level Stimulus-Response Compatibility Effects for Different Manual Response Sets.
    Proctor RW; Wang H
    J Mot Behav; 1997 Dec; 29(4):351-65. PubMed ID: 12453776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.