These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20919780)

  • 1. Why additional presentations help identify a stimulus.
    Guest D; Kent C; Adelman JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1609-30. PubMed ID: 20919780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How does target duration affect object substitution masking?
    Gellatly A; Pilling M; Carter W; Guest D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1267-79. PubMed ID: 20873938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Change detection: evidence for information accumulation in flicker paradigms.
    Vierck E; Kiesel A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):309-23. PubMed ID: 17662952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The time course of configural change detection for novel 3-D objects.
    Favelle S; Palmisano S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):999-1012. PubMed ID: 20436196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Better to take one long or two quick looks? Independent processing of evidence from discrete visual presentations.
    Schwarz W; Kühn S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1337-52. PubMed ID: 19045979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: understanding the cognitive representations of time.
    Vallesi A; Binns MA; Shallice T
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):501-27. PubMed ID: 18076872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The intermixed-blocked effect in human perceptual learning is not the consequence of trial spacing.
    Mitchell C; Nash S; Hall G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):237-42. PubMed ID: 18194066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice.
    Hazeltine E; Teague D; Ivry RB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):527-45. PubMed ID: 12075886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Capacity limitations of visual memory in two-interval comparison of Gabor arrays.
    Lakha L; Wright MJ
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(14):1707-16. PubMed ID: 15136005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Going, going, gone: localizing abrupt offsets of moving objects.
    Maus GW; Nijhawan R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):611-26. PubMed ID: 19485681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lateral masking, levels of processing and stimulus category: a comparative study between normal and dyslexic readers.
    Pernet C; Valdois S; Celsis P; Démonet JF
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2374-85. PubMed ID: 16777147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Object substitution masking: when does mask preview work?
    Lim SW; Chua FK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1108-15. PubMed ID: 18823198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transformation of stimulus information from very short-term memory.
    Klein HA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Jun; 44(3 Pt 1):951-8. PubMed ID: 876807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Working memory costs of task switching.
    Liefooghe B; Barrouillet P; Vandierendonck A; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Object-selective cortex exhibits performance-independent repetition suppression.
    Sayres R; Grill-Spector K
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 95(2):995-1007. PubMed ID: 16236787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of exposure duration on visual character identification in single, whole, and partial report.
    Petersen A; Andersen TS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):498-514. PubMed ID: 22288689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lack of set size effects in spatial updating: Evidence for offline updating.
    Hodgson E; Waller D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):854-66. PubMed ID: 16822153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Timing, storage, and comparison of stimulus duration engage discrete anatomical components of a perceptual timing network.
    Coull JT; Nazarian B; Vidal F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2185-97. PubMed ID: 18457512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.