These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20919781)

  • 21. Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.
    Moore KS; Weissman DH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1495-509. PubMed ID: 20675796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search.
    Burnham BR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection.
    Theeuwes J; Van der Burg E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1335-51. PubMed ID: 18085947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Age-related deficits in guided search using cues.
    Gottlob LR
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):526-34. PubMed ID: 16953714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Top-down controlled, delayed selection in the attentional blink.
    Nieuwenstein MR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):973-85. PubMed ID: 16846292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The impact of multiple irrelevant visual events at the same spatial location on inhibition.
    Visser TA; Barnes D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 19304628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Golay L
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task.
    Wienrich C; Janczyk M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Focused spatial attention is independent of rapid resumption of an interrupted search.
    Lleras A; Enns JT
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):565-77. PubMed ID: 19304647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
    Lamy D; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contingent capture can occur at specific feature values: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Jiao J; Zhao G; Wang Q; Zhang K; Li H; Sun HJ; Liu Q
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 23069637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Temporal attentional capture: effects of irrelevant singletons on rapid serial visual search.
    Dalton P; Lavie N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):881-5. PubMed ID: 17328389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attentional capture by an unannounced color singleton depends on expectation discrepancy.
    Horstmann G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1039-60. PubMed ID: 16262497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Region segmentation and contextual cuing in visual search.
    Conci M; von Mühlenen A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1514-24. PubMed ID: 19801612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Coordination of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control in human cortex.
    Serences JT; Shomstein S; Leber AB; Golay X; Egeth HE; Yantis S
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Feb; 16(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 15686577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A feature-weighting account of priming in conjunction search.
    Becker SI; Horstmann G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 19304616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Less attention and more perception in cued line bisection.
    Fischer MH
    Brain Cogn; 1994 May; 25(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 8043264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting.
    Muller HJ; Reimann B; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1021-35. PubMed ID: 14585020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory and visual capture during focused visual attention.
    Koelewijn T; Bronkhorst A; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1303-15. PubMed ID: 19803638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention?
    Remington RW; Folk CL; McLean JP
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):298-307. PubMed ID: 11281104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.