These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20920412)

  • 21. A Novel Multifactorial Approach to Developing Mild Laundry Detergents and Assessing Their Relative Mildness.
    Fowler JF; J Zirwas MJZ; Napolitano L; Russell M; Coope-Epstein J
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2017 Dec; 16(12):1235-1239. PubMed ID: 29240858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cocamidopropyl betaine: the significance of positive patch test results in twelve patients.
    Fowler JF
    Cutis; 1993 Nov; 52(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 8299389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Human irritant response to different qualities and concentrations of cocoamidopropylbetaines: a possible model of paradoxical irritant response.
    Vilaplana J; Mascaró JM; Trullás C; Coll J; Romaguera C; Zemba C; Pelejero C
    Contact Dermatitis; 1992 May; 26(5):289-94. PubMed ID: 1395588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Evaluating skin tolerance. Study of skin cleansing agents in modifications of the Duhring chamber test].
    Kresken J; Eckert J; Wassilew SW
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1989; 37(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 2721380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Skin irritability to sodium lauryl sulfate is associated with increased positive patch test reactions.
    Schwitulla J; Brasch J; Löffler H; Schnuch A; Geier J; Uter W
    Br J Dermatol; 2014 Jul; 171(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 24593017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [ANALYSIS OF PATCH TEST RESULTS USING COCAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE-RELATED SURFACTANTS].
    Iijima S; Murayama K; Takayama N; Shigemitsu S; Ishihara T; Sugiyama M; Matsunaga K
    Arerugi; 2023; 72(8):1038-1045. PubMed ID: 37730347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Skin irritation potential of mixed surfactant systems.
    Hall-Manning TJ; Holland GH; Rennie G; Revell P; Hines J; Barratt MD; Basketter DA
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1998 Mar; 36(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 9609395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Testing of toilet detergents for skin irritation. Clinical readings and measurement of blood circulation by laser Doppler technic].
    Serup J; Ploug E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1987 Feb; 149(7):472-3. PubMed ID: 3824640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Topical botanically derived products: use, skin reactions, and usefulness of patch tests. A multicentre Italian study.
    Corazza M; Borghi A; Gallo R; Schena D; Pigatto P; Lauriola MM; Guarneri F; Stingeni L; Vincenzi C; Foti C; Virgili A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Feb; 70(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 23909860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The use of cleansers as therapeutic concomitants in various dermatologic disorders.
    Bikowski J
    Cutis; 2001 Dec; 68(5 Suppl):12-9. PubMed ID: 11845951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Irritation potential of bath and shower oils before and after use: a double-blind randomized study.
    Lodén M; Buraczewska I; Edlund F
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Jun; 150(6):1142-7. PubMed ID: 15214901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Comparison between contact eczema in Poland and in the Democratic Republic of Germany. III. Skin changes caused by non-occupational factors].
    Rudzki E; Schubert H
    Przegl Dermatol; 1980; 67(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 7433703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Allergic eczematous contact dermatitis due to fatty acid polypeptide condensates (author's transl)].
    Gall H; Rodermund OE
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1980; 28(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7408640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Allergologic aspects of skin-cleansing products.
    Richter G
    Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 1990; 108():10-2. PubMed ID: 2247981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Threshold of contact allergy to stearamidoethyl diethylamine in guinea pigs].
    Sun CC; Chen LY
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1994 Mar; 93 Suppl 1():S23-8. PubMed ID: 7920091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multicenter study of preservative sensitivity in patients with suspected cosmetic contact dermatitis in Korea.
    Lee SS; Hong DK; Jeong NJ; Lee JH; Choi YS; Lee AY; Lee CH; Kim KJ; Park HY; Yang JM; Lee GY; Lee J; Eun HC; Moon KC; Seo SJ; Hong CK; Lee SW; Choi HY; Lee JY
    J Dermatol; 2012 Aug; 39(8):677-81. PubMed ID: 22548403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Chronic eyelid dermatitis secondary to cocamidopropyl betaine allergy in a patient using baby shampoo eyelid scrubs.
    Welling JD; Mauger TF; Schoenfield LR; Hendershot AJ
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Mar; 132(3):357-9. PubMed ID: 24408863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cumulative irritation potential and contact sensitization potential of tazarotene foam 0.1% in 2 phase 1 patch studies.
    Berg JE; Bowman JP; Saenz AB
    Cutis; 2012 Oct; 90(4):206-11. PubMed ID: 23259209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Final report on the safety assessment of Cocoyl Sarcosine, Lauroyl Sarcosine, Myristoyl Sarcosine, Oleoyl Sarcosine, Stearoyl Sarcosine, Sodium Cocoyl Sarcosinate, Sodium Lauroyl Sarcosinate, Sodium Myristoyl Sarcosinate, Ammonium Cocoyl Sarcosinate, and Ammonium Lauroyl Sarcosinate.
    Lanigan RS
    Int J Toxicol; 2001; 20 Suppl 1():1-14. PubMed ID: 11358107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Dermatoses due to detergents and cleansers].
    Szarmach H; Golebiowska-Podgórczyk ; Filipiuk J
    Przegl Dermatol; 1970; 57(4):503-11. PubMed ID: 5457382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.