170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20920413)
1. Patch-testing with plastics and glues series allergens.
Shmidt E; Farmer SA; Davis MD
Dermatitis; 2010; 21(5):269-74. PubMed ID: 20920413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patch-test reactions to plastic and glue allergens.
Kanerva L; Jolanki R; Alanko K; Estlander T
Acta Derm Venereol; 1999 Jul; 79(4):296-300. PubMed ID: 10429988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of patients with allergic patch test reactions to a plastics and glues series.
Tarvainen K
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Jun; 32(6):346-51. PubMed ID: 7554881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Results of patch testing with a specialized collection of plastic and glue allergens.
Holness DL; Nethercottdagger JR
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Jun; 8(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 9171151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, january 1, 2001, through december 31, 2005.
Davis MD; Scalf LA; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; El-Azhary RA; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL; Connolly SM
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jan; 144(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 18209170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening for acrylate/methacrylate allergy in the baseline series: our experience in Sweden and Singapore.
Goon AT; Bruze M; Zimerson E; Goh CL; Soo-Quee Koh D; Isaksson M
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Nov; 59(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 18976382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.
Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2009 to 2010.
Warshaw EM; Belsito DV; Taylor JS; Sasseville D; DeKoven JG; Zirwas MJ; Fransway AF; Mathias CG; Zug KA; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Marks JG; Pratt MD; Storrs FJ; Maibach HI
Dermatitis; 2013; 24(2):50-9. PubMed ID: 23474444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contact allergy to acrylates/methacrylates in the acrylate and nail acrylics series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens.
Teik-Jin Goon A; Bruze M; Zimerson E; Goh CL; Isaksson M
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jul; 57(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 17577353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Occupational methacrylate and acrylate allergy from glues.
Aalto-Korte K; Alanko K; Kuuliala O; Jolanki R
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Jun; 58(6):340-6. PubMed ID: 18503683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Standard 65-allergen series alone in the evaluation of allergic contact dermatitis: a series of 794 patients.
Cohen DE; Rao S; Brancaccio RR
Dermatitis; 2008; 19(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 18627685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acrylate contact allergy: patient characteristics and evaluation of screening allergens.
Drucker AM; Pratt MD
Dermatitis; 2011; 22(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 21504694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A multi-center, retrospective review of patch testing for contact dermatitis in allergy practices.
Camacho-Halili M; Axelrod S; Michelis MA; Lighvani S; Khan F; Leon S; Aquino MR; Davis-Lorton M; Fonacier LS
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2011 Dec; 107(6):487-92. PubMed ID: 22123377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Justification for introducing specific patch test series in the diagnosis of contact allergies].
Jovanović M; Milakov J
Med Pregl; 1990; 43(5-6):242-6. PubMed ID: 2287311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period.
Pratt MD; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Zug K
Dermatitis; 2004 Dec; 15(4):176-83. PubMed ID: 15842061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Common allergens in shoe dermatitis: our experience in Lahore, Pakistan.
Rani Z; Hussain I; Haroon TS
Int J Dermatol; 2003 Aug; 42(8):605-7. PubMed ID: 12890102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patch test reactions associated with sunscreen products and the importance of testing to an expanded series: retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001 to 2010.
Warshaw EM; Wang MZ; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Zug KA; Taylor JS; Mathias CG; Sasseville D; Zirwas MJ; Fowler JF; DeKoven JG; Fransway AF; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Pratt MD; Storrs FJ
Dermatitis; 2013; 24(4):176-82. PubMed ID: 23857015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patch testing and contact allergens in Ethiopia--results of 514 contact dermatitis patients using the European baseline series.
Bilcha KD; Ayele A; Shibeshi D; Lovell C
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Sep; 63(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 20690936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
