135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20920441)
1. Analysis of the Nova Stat Strip® glucose meter for real-time blood glucose determinations during glucose clamp studies: "don't swap horses in midstream".
Heinemann L
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Sep; 4(5):1202-4. PubMed ID: 20920441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and reliability of the Nova StatStrip® glucose meter for real-time blood glucose determinations during glucose clamp studies.
Rabiee A; Magruder JT; Grant C; Salas-Carrillo R; Gillette A; DuBois J; Shannon RP; Andersen DK; Elahi D
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Sep; 4(5):1195-201. PubMed ID: 20920440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of GlucoMen®Day: a novel microdialysis-based continuous glucose monitor.
Kubiak T
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Sep; 4(5):1193-4. PubMed ID: 20920439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The evaluation of analytical performance of the Precision G point-of-care glucometer.
Solnica B; Naskalski JW; Sieradzki J
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2001 Dec; 39(12):1283-6. PubMed ID: 11798091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197.
Baumstark A; Pleus S; Schmid C; Link M; Haug C; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 6(5):1076-86. PubMed ID: 23063033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analytical performance of glucose monitoring systems at different blood glucose ranges and analysis of outliers in a clinical setting.
Hasslacher C; Kulozik F; Platten I
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 May; 8(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 24876607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rate-of-Change Dependence of the Performance of Two CGM Systems During Induced Glucose Swings.
Pleus S; Schoemaker M; Morgenstern K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Haug C; Link M; Zschornack E; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 25852074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laboratory Evaluation of Linearity, Repeatability, and Hematocrit Interference With an Internet-Enabled Blood Glucose Meter.
Demircik F; Kirsch V; Ramljak S; Vogg M; Pfützner AH; Pfützner A
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 May; 13(3):514-521. PubMed ID: 30974988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technical and clinical evaluation of an electrochemistry glucose meter: experience in a diabetes center.
Chen HS; Kuo BI; Hwu CM; Shih KC; Kwok CF; Ho LT
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 1998 Oct; 42(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 9884028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the performance of the CONTOUR® TS Blood Glucose Monitoring System: when regulatory performance criteria are met, should we have confidence to use a medical device with all patients?
Lyon ME; Lyon AW
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 5(1):206-8. PubMed ID: 21303646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of the performance of the OneTouch SelectSimple blood glucose monitoring system: why ease of use studies need to be part of accuracy studies.
Krouwer JS
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Nov; 5(6):1610-1. PubMed ID: 22226285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How to Assess the Quality of Glucose Clamps? Evaluation of Clamps Performed With ClampArt, a Novel Automated Clamp Device.
Benesch C; Heise T; Klein O; Heinemann L; Arnolds S
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):792-800. PubMed ID: 25852075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Best blood glucose meters.
Consum Rep; 2011 Nov; 76(11):52. PubMed ID: 22022757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of a new meter designed for assisted monitoring of blood glucose and point-of-care testing.
Macrury S; Srinivasan A; Mahoney JJ
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 7(2):389-98. PubMed ID: 23566997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. System Accuracy Assessment of a Blood Glucose Meter With Wireless Internet Access Associated With Unusual Hypoglycemia Patterns in Clinical Trials.
Pfützner A; Demircik F; Kirsch V; Pfützner J; Strobl S; Hanna M; Spatz J; Pfützner AH
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 May; 13(3):507-513. PubMed ID: 30974985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the clinical accuracy of GlucoMen®Day: a novel microdialysis-based continuous glucose monitor.
Valgimigli F; Lucarelli F; Scuffi C; Morandi S; Sposato I
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Sep; 4(5):1182-92. PubMed ID: 20920438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical usefulness of a non-wiping type glucose meter in diabetic patients.
Kishimoto M; Kawamori R; Kubota M; Ikeda M; Morishima T; Yamasaki Y; Kamada T
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 1993 Apr; 20(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 8344128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and utility of a 10-test disk blood glucose meter.
Kendall DM; Kaplan RA; Paulson CF; Parkes JL; Tideman AM
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2005 Jan; 67(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 15620431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of lancing devices for self-monitoring of blood glucose regarding lancing pain.
Kocher S; Tshiananga JK; Koubek R
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2009 Sep; 3(5):1136-43. PubMed ID: 20144427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Several steps forward: a new meter for multiple patient use.
Le HT; Rice MJ
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 7(2):399-401. PubMed ID: 23566998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
