These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20921102)

  • 1. Selective attention and response set in the Stroop task.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A; Rabeling-Keus IM
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Oct; 38(7):893-904. PubMed ID: 20921102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Picture-word interference is a Stroop effect: A theoretical analysis and new empirical findings.
    Starreveld PA; La Heij W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):721-733. PubMed ID: 27714665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trial type mixing substantially reduces the response set effect in the Stroop task.
    Hasshim N; Parris BA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():43-53. PubMed ID: 28335990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Active inhibition of a distractor word: the distractor precue benefit in the Stroop color-naming task.
    Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):799-812. PubMed ID: 21480743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interacting congruency effects in the hybrid Stroop-Simon task prevent conclusions regarding the domain specificity or generality of the congruency sequence effect.
    Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):945-967. PubMed ID: 31580121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective inhibition and naming performance in semantic blocking, picture-word interference, and color-word Stroop tasks.
    Shao Z; Roelofs A; Martin RC; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1806-1820. PubMed ID: 26030631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention, spatial integration, and the tail of response time distributions in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):135-50. PubMed ID: 21936655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Brain Potentials to Functionally Localise Stroop-Like Effects in Colour and Picture Naming: Perceptual Encoding versus Word Planning.
    Shitova N; Roelofs A; Schriefers H; Bastiaansen M; Schoffelen JM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161052. PubMed ID: 27632171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An ERP investigation of the working memory stroop effect.
    Wang W; Qi M; Gao H
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Feb; 152():107752. PubMed ID: 33453265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The color-word Stroop effect driven by working memory maintenance.
    Pan Y; Han Y; Zuo W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2722-2731. PubMed ID: 31214969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive control during a spatial Stroop task: Comparing conflict monitoring and prediction of response-outcome theories.
    Pires L; Leitão J; Guerrini C; Simões MR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():63-75. PubMed ID: 28683927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orthographic properties of distractors do influence phonological Stroop effects: Evidence from Japanese Romaji distractors.
    Yoshihara M; Nakayama M; Verdonschot RG; Hino Y; Lupker SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):600-612. PubMed ID: 33021727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; van der Meij R
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.
    Bugg JM; Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):433-49. PubMed ID: 22845037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What Stroop tasks can tell us about selective attention from childhood to adulthood.
    Wright BC
    Br J Psychol; 2017 Aug; 108(3):583-607. PubMed ID: 27786354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attention, temporal predictability, and the time course of context effects in naming performance.
    Roelofs A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Feb; 133(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 19963201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 May; 116(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 15111228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A reach-to-touch investigation on the nature of reading in the Stroop task.
    Tillman G; Eidels A; Finkbeiner M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2547-2557. PubMed ID: 27549606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.