These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20921474)

  • 21. Curricular considerations for pharmaceutical comparative effectiveness research.
    Murray MD
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2011 Aug; 20(8):797-804. PubMed ID: 21796716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research: from assessing public health benefits to being open with the public.
    Dubois RW; Graff JS
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 Dec; 30(12):2235-42. PubMed ID: 22147850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative effectiveness research: what effects for nurses?
    Largent E
    Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2011; 30(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 21135606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating collaborations in comparative effectiveness research: opportunities and challenges for social network analysis.
    Zickafoose JS; Kimmey LD; Tomas A; Esposito D; Rich E
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Nov; 3(6):667-75. PubMed ID: 25494573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Let the research begin. Comparative-effectiveness grants fund variety of projects.
    McKinney M
    Mod Healthc; 2010 Oct; 40(41):8-9. PubMed ID: 21038562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Building sustainable multi-functional prospective electronic clinical data systems.
    Randhawa GS; Slutsky JR
    Med Care; 2012 Jul; 50 Suppl():S3-6. PubMed ID: 22692255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The relevance of international studies to informed pharmacoeconomics and health policy decisions.
    Lyles A
    Clin Ther; 2010 Jan; 32(1):106-7. PubMed ID: 20171416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.
    Nestor B; Gold RB
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 6432576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comments on 'Comparative effectiveness research: Policy context, methods development and research infrastructure'.
    Morton SC
    Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(19):1989-90; discussion 1996-7. PubMed ID: 20683889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative effectiveness. An idea whose time has finally come.
    Sipkoff M
    Manag Care; 2009 Apr; 18(4):14-6, 19-21. PubMed ID: 19472562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Federal spending for illness caused by the human immunodeficiency virus.
    Winkenwerder W; Kessler AR; Stolec RM
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Jun; 320(24):1598-603. PubMed ID: 2498660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of comparative effectiveness on U.S. healthcare providers.
    Bigalke JT
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2009 Oct; 63(10):74-8. PubMed ID: 19810656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative effectiveness and real-world evidence.
    Leonard DT
    Am J Manag Care; 2010 Jun; 16(6):410-1. PubMed ID: 20560684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1983.
    Gold RB; Nestor B
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 3884361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing the long-term impact of public investments in comparative effectiveness research: conceptual framework and lessons learned.
    Rich EC; Esposito D; Kimmey LD; Valenzano CS; Yong PL
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Nov; 3(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 25494572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Building electronic data infrastructure for comparative effectiveness research: accomplishments, lessons learned and future steps.
    Randhawa GS
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Nov; 3(6):567-72. PubMed ID: 25494561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A flexible approach to evidentiary standards for comparative effectiveness research.
    Garrison LP; Neumann PJ; Radensky P; Walcoff SD
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Oct; 29(10):1812-7. PubMed ID: 20921480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative effectiveness research: so far, so good.
    Wilensky GR
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2010 Nov; 64(11):34, 36. PubMed ID: 21061815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. US midterm elections: Opponents battle health-care research.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):763. PubMed ID: 20944705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The historical and moral imperatives of comparative effectiveness research.
    Lauer MS
    Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(19):1982-4; discussion 1996-7. PubMed ID: 20683887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.