271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20921989)
1. FTIR spectroscopic discrimination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bayanus strains.
Adt I; Kohler A; Gognies S; Budin J; Sandt C; Belarbi A; Manfait M; Sockalingum GD
Can J Microbiol; 2010 Sep; 56(9):793-801. PubMed ID: 20921989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Molecular typing of wine yeast strains Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum using microsatellite markers.
Masneuf-Pomarède I; Le Jeune C; Durrens P; Lollier M; Aigle M; Dubourdieu D
Syst Appl Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 30(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 16621402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of natural hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum.
Le Jeune C; Lollier M; Demuyter C; Erny C; Legras JL; Aigle M; Masneuf-Pomarède I
FEMS Yeast Res; 2007 Jun; 7(4):540-9. PubMed ID: 17302940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Molecular genetic study of introgression between Saccharomyces bayanus and S. cerevisiae.
Naumova ES; Naumov GI; Masneuf-Pomarède I; Aigle M; Dubourdieu D
Yeast; 2005 Oct; 22(14):1099-115. PubMed ID: 16240458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic homology between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its sibling species S. paradoxus and S. bayanus: electrophoretic karyotypes.
Naumov GI; Naumova ES; Lantto RA; Louis EJ; Korhola M
Yeast; 1992 Aug; 8(8):599-612. PubMed ID: 1441740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Reclassification of Saccharomyces strains by comparative electrophoretic karyotyping].
Bai F; Jia J
Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2000 Feb; 40(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 12548871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Molecular tools for differentiating probiotic and clinical strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Posteraro B; Sanguinetti M; Romano L; Torelli R; Novarese L; Fadda G
Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 103(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 16099314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multilocus sequence typing of oenological Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.
Muñoz R; Gómez A; Robles V; Rodríguez P; Cebollero E; Tabera L; Carrascosa AV; Gonzalez R
Food Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 26(8):841-6. PubMed ID: 19835769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapid identification and differentiation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces bayanus and their hybrids by multiplex PCR.
Torriani S; Zapparoli G; Malacrinò P; Suzzi G; Dellaglio F
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2004; 38(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 14962047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic diversity study of the yeast Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum reveals introgressed subtelomeric Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes.
Naumova ES; Naumov GI; Michailova YV; Martynenko NN; Masneuf-Pomarède I
Res Microbiol; 2011; 162(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 21112388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evolutionary relationships between the former species Saccharomyces uvarum and the hybrids Saccharomyces bayanus and Saccharomyces pastorianus; reinstatement of Saccharomyces uvarum (Beijerinck) as a distinct species.
Nguyen HV; Gaillardin C
FEMS Yeast Res; 2005 Feb; 5(4-5):471-83. PubMed ID: 15691752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of some oenological properties in wine strains of Candida stellata, Candida zemplinina, Saccharomyces uvarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Magyar I; Tóth T
Food Microbiol; 2011 Feb; 28(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 21056780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Molecular and physiological comparisons between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces boulardii.
Fietto JL; Araújo RS; Valadão FN; Fietto LG; Brandão RL; Neves MJ; Gomes FC; Nicoli JR; Castro IM
Can J Microbiol; 2004 Aug; 50(8):615-21. PubMed ID: 15467787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic and phenotypic diversity of Saccharomyces sensu stricto strains isolated from Amarone wine. Diversity of Saccharomyces strains from Amarone wine.
Torriani S; Zapparoli G; Suzzi G
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 1999 Apr; 75(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 10427409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism of the yeast Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum.
Naumova ES; Naumov GI; Barrio E; Querol A
Mikrobiologiia; 2010; 79(4):543-50. PubMed ID: 21058508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Natural hybrids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces bayanus and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in wine fermentations.
González SS; Barrio E; Gafner J; Querol A
FEMS Yeast Res; 2006 Dec; 6(8):1221-34. PubMed ID: 17156019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AFLP analysis of type strains and laboratory and industrial strains of Saccharomyces sensu stricto and its application to phenetic clustering.
Azumi M; Goto-Yamamoto N
Yeast; 2001 Sep; 18(12):1145-54. PubMed ID: 11536336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phylogenetic analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae group based on polymorphisms of rDNA spacer sequences.
Montrocher R; Verner MC; Briolay J; Gautier C; Marmeisse R
Int J Syst Bacteriol; 1998 Jan; 48 Pt 1():295-303. PubMed ID: 9542100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Saccharomyces paradoxus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are associated with exudates of North American oaks.
Naumov GI; Naumova ES; Sniegowski PD
Can J Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 44(11):1045-50. PubMed ID: 10029999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetically different wine yeasts isolated from Austrian vine-growing regions influence wine aroma differently and contain putative hybrids between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii.
Lopandic K; Gangl H; Wallner E; Tscheik G; Leitner G; Querol A; Borth N; Breitenbach M; Prillinger H; Tiefenbrunner W
FEMS Yeast Res; 2007 Sep; 7(6):953-65. PubMed ID: 17484739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
