These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20922647)

  • 21. Measurable outcomes of quality improvement using a daily quality rounds checklist: one-year analysis in a trauma intensive care unit with sustained ventilator-associated pneumonia reduction.
    Dubose J; Teixeira PG; Inaba K; Lam L; Talving P; Putty B; Plurad D; Green DJ; Demetriades D; Belzberg H
    J Trauma; 2010 Oct; 69(4):855-60. PubMed ID: 20032792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.
    Shea B; Bouter LM; Grimshaw JM; Francis D; Ortiz Z; Wells GA; Tugwell PS; Boers M
    J Rheumatol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16267878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in laboratory medicine: principles and methods].
    Watine J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2004; 62(6):611-27. PubMed ID: 15563420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Alzheimer patients are underserved].
    Krankenpfl J; 2005; 43(4-6):146. PubMed ID: 16171089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. To compress or not to compress: a compressed debate.
    Siegel EL; Khorasani R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):981-3. PubMed ID: 17411741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Guideline panels should not GRADE good practice statements.
    Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ; Djulbegovic B; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 25660962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [A systematic guide for reading and interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies].
    Panner J; Schuetz GM; Hamm B; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):909-12. PubMed ID: 21972042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Standardization in radiology--protocols, procedures, and reports: best for patients and providers.
    Ellenbogen PH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Sep; 10(9):641. PubMed ID: 23910383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Is there a voucher for the impact of quality assurance/-improvement methods in foreign countries?].
    Simoes E; Boukamp K; Mayer ED; Schmahl FW
    Gesundheitswesen; 2004 Jun; 66(6):370-9. PubMed ID: 15206040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes.
    Guyatt GH; Oxman AD; Kunz R; Atkins D; Brozek J; Vist G; Alderson P; Glasziou P; Falck-Ytter Y; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 21194891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Systematic reviews synthesized evidence without consistent quality assessment of primary studies examining epidemiology of chronic diseases.
    Shamliyan T; Kane RL; Jansen S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 65(6):610-8. PubMed ID: 22424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Guideline based diagnosis and therapy can improve medical standards].
    Erdmann E
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Jan; 135(4):119. PubMed ID: 20101553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis.
    Puhan MA; Schünemann HJ; Murad MH; Li T; Brignardello-Petersen R; Singh JA; Kessels AG; Guyatt GH;
    BMJ; 2014 Sep; 349():g5630. PubMed ID: 25252733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Meta-analyses of small numbers of trials often agree with longer-term results.
    Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 20609563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Diagnostic imaging practice guidelines for musculoskeletal complaints in adults-an evidence-based approach-part 3: spinal disorders.
    Bussières AE; Taylor JA; Peterson C
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 Jan; 31(1):33-88. PubMed ID: 18308153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Systematic reviews of studies of diagnostic test accuracy].
    Moreno G G; Pantoja C T
    Rev Med Chil; 2009 Feb; 137(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 19543656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evidence in diagnostic imaging: going beyond accuracy.
    Reed MH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Feb; 9(2):90-2. PubMed ID: 22305692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria.
    Evers S; Goossens M; de Vet H; van Tulder M; Ament A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):240-5. PubMed ID: 15921065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical practice guidelines.
    Twaddle S
    Singapore Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(12):681-6; quiz 687. PubMed ID: 16308640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Rapid reviews for evidence-based decision support. (Restricting) requirements].
    Ziegler S; Lühmann D; Raspe H; Windeler J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2001 Feb; 95(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 11268875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.