200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20923045)
1. Cognitive biases and decision making in gambling.
Chóliz M
Psychol Rep; 2010 Aug; 107(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 20923045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Expressing gambling-related cognitive biases in motor behaviour: rolling dice to win prizes.
Lim MS; Bowden-Jones H; Rogers RD
J Gambl Stud; 2014 Sep; 30(3):625-37. PubMed ID: 23620161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structural characteristics of video lotteries: effects of a stopping device on illusion of control and gambling persistence.
Ladouceur R; Sévigny S
J Gambl Stud; 2005; 21(2):117-31. PubMed ID: 15870983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigating the illusion of control in mildly depressed and nondepressed individuals during video-poker play.
Dannewitz H; Weatherly JN
J Psychol; 2007 May; 141(3):307-19. PubMed ID: 17564260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond the gambling paradigm: internal controllability in decision-making.
Brandstätter E; Schwarzenberger H
Psychol Rep; 2001 Oct; 89(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 11783545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cognitive distortions as a component and treatment focus of pathological gambling: a review.
Fortune EE; Goodie AS
Psychol Addict Behav; 2012 Jun; 26(2):298-310. PubMed ID: 22121918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Illusion of control by proxy: placing one's fate in the hands of another.
Wohl MJ; Enzle ME
Br J Soc Psychol; 2009 Mar; 48(Pt 1):183-200. PubMed ID: 18034916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Causal Learning in Gambling Disorder: Beyond the Illusion of Control.
Perales JC; Navas JF; Ruiz de Lara CM; Maldonado A; Catena A
J Gambl Stud; 2017 Jun; 33(2):705-717. PubMed ID: 27664136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Illusion of control relative to chance outcomes.
Rudski JM
Psychol Rep; 2000 Aug; 87(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 11026393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Illusory control, gambling, and video gaming: an investigation of regular gamblers and video game players.
King DL; Ejova A; Delfabbro PH
J Gambl Stud; 2012 Sep; 28(3):421-35. PubMed ID: 21927806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reports of wins and risk taking: an investigation of the mediating effect of the illusion of control.
Martinez F; Le Floch V; Gaffié B; Villejoubert G
J Gambl Stud; 2011 Jun; 27(2):271-85. PubMed ID: 20532965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Active involvement, not illusory control, increases risk taking in a gambling game.
Martinez F; Bonnefon JF; Hoskens J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1063-71. PubMed ID: 19125370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Expertise and gambling: using type 2 signal detection theory to investigate differences between regular gamblers and nongamblers.
Lueddeke SE; Higham PA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1850-71. PubMed ID: 21846266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The illusion of handy wins: Problem gambling, chasing, and affective decision-making.
Nigro G; Ciccarelli M; Cosenza M
J Affect Disord; 2018 Jan; 225():256-259. PubMed ID: 28841489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using cross-game behavioral markers for early identification of high-risk internet gamblers.
Braverman J; LaPlante DA; Nelson SE; Shaffer HJ
Psychol Addict Behav; 2013 Sep; 27(3):868-77. PubMed ID: 24059836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: evidence from the Iowa gambling task.
Cassotti M; Moutier S
Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20015585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unsafe sex: decision-making biases and heuristics.
Kaplan BJ; Shayne VT
AIDS Educ Prev; 1993; 5(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 8297709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do individual differences in Iowa Gambling Task performance predict adaptive decision making for risky gains and losses?
Weller JA; Levin IP; Bechara A
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2010 Feb; 32(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19484643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using neural networks to model the behavior and decisions of gamblers, in particular, cyber-gamblers.
Chan VK
J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):35-52. PubMed ID: 19593655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptions among pathological and nonpathological gamblers.
Ladouceur R
Addict Behav; 2004 May; 29(3):555-65. PubMed ID: 15050673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
