117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20923468)
1. Objective melanoma progression.
Rubegni P; Burroni M; Nami N; Cevenini G; Bono R; Sbano P; Fimiani M
Skin Res Technol; 2011 Feb; 17(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 20923468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Objective follow-up of atypical melanocytic skin lesions: a retrospective study.
Rubegni P; Cevenini G; Burroni M; Bono R; Sbano P; Biagioli M; Risulo M; Nami N; Perotti R; Miracco C; Fimiani M
Arch Dermatol Res; 2010 Sep; 302(7):551-60. PubMed ID: 20411393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of cutaneous melanoma thickness by digital dermoscopy analysis: a retrospective study.
Rubegni P; Cevenini G; Sbano P; Burroni M; Zalaudek I; Risulo M; Dell'Eva G; Nami N; Martino A; Fimiani M
Melanoma Res; 2010 Jun; 20(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 20375922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improvement of malignant/benign ratio in excised melanocytic lesions in the 'dermoscopy era': a retrospective study 1997-2001.
Carli P; De Giorgi V; Crocetti E; Mannone F; Massi D; Chiarugi A; Giannotti B
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Apr; 150(4):687-92. PubMed ID: 15099364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selection of patients for long-term surveillance with digital dermoscopy by assessment of melanoma risk factors.
Haenssle HA; Korpas B; Hansen-Hagge C; Buhl T; Kaune KM; Johnsen S; Rosenberger A; Schön MP; Emmert S
Arch Dermatol; 2010 Mar; 146(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 20231495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the optimal interval for and sensitivity of short-term sequential digital dermoscopy monitoring for the diagnosis of melanoma.
Altamura D; Avramidis M; Menzies SW
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 144(4):502-6. PubMed ID: 18427044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Follow-up of malignant melanoma].
Truchetet F; Chartier C; Heid E
Ann Dermatol Venereol; 1989; 116(5):437-40. PubMed ID: 2675740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Limitations of dermoscopy in the recognition of melanoma.
Skvara H; Teban L; Fiebiger M; Binder M; Kittler H
Arch Dermatol; 2005 Feb; 141(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 15724011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of clinically featureless incipient melanoma using sequential dermoscopy imaging.
Kittler H; Guitera P; Riedl E; Avramidis M; Teban L; Fiebiger M; Weger RA; Dawid M; Menzies S
Arch Dermatol; 2006 Sep; 142(9):1113-9. PubMed ID: 16982998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The performance of SolarScan: an automated dermoscopy image analysis instrument for the diagnosis of primary melanoma.
Menzies SW; Bischof L; Talbot H; Gutenev A; Avramidis M; Wong L; Lo SK; Mackellar G; Skladnev V; McCarthy W; Kelly J; Cranney B; Lye P; Rabinovitz H; Oliviero M; Blum A; Varol A; De'Ambrosis B; McCleod R; Koga H; Grin C; Braun R; Johr R
Arch Dermatol; 2005 Nov; 141(11):1388-96. PubMed ID: 16301386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Slow-growing melanoma: a dermoscopy follow-up study.
Argenziano G; Kittler H; Ferrara G; Rubegni P; Malvehy J; Puig S; Cowell L; Stanganelli I; De Giorgi V; Thomas L; Bahadoran P; Menzies SW; Piccolo D; Marghoob AA; Zalaudek I
Br J Dermatol; 2010 Feb; 162(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 19785607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surveillance of patients at high risk for cutaneous malignant melanoma using digital dermoscopy.
Bauer J; Blum A; Strohhäcker U; Garbe C
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Jan; 152(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 15656806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dermoscopic monitoring of melanocytic skin lesions: clinical outcome and patient compliance vary according to follow-up protocols.
Argenziano G; Mordente I; Ferrara G; Sgambato A; Annese P; Zalaudek I
Br J Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 159(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 18510663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital dermoscopy in clinical practise: a three-centre analysis.
Wollina U; Burroni M; Torricelli R; Gilardi S; Dell'Eva G; Helm C; Bardey W
Skin Res Technol; 2007 May; 13(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 17374053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CASH algorithm for dermoscopy revisited.
Henning JS; Stein JA; Yeung J; Dusza SW; Marghoob AA; Rabinovitz HS; Polsky D; Kopf AW
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 144(4):554-5. PubMed ID: 18427058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pre-diagnostic digital imaging prediction model to discriminate between malignant melanoma and benign pigmented skin lesion.
Christensen JH; Soerensen MB; Linghui Z; Chen S; Jensen MO
Skin Res Technol; 2010 Feb; 16(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 20384888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lentigo maligna melanoma with folliculotropism: dermoscopic features during rapid progression.
Kilinc-Karaarslan I; Akalin T; Ozdemir F
Arch Dermatol; 2009 Jun; 145(6):725-6. PubMed ID: 19528438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital image analysis for diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Development of a highly effective computer algorithm based on analysis of 837 melanocytic lesions.
Blum A; Luedtke H; Ellwanger U; Schwabe R; Rassner G; Garbe C
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Nov; 151(5):1029-38. PubMed ID: 15541081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lesion border detection in dermoscopy images using dynamic programming.
Abbas Q; Celebi ME; Fondón García I; Rashid M
Skin Res Technol; 2011 Feb; 17(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 21226876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unsupervised segmentation for digital dermoscopic images.
Møllersen K; Kirchesch HM; Schopf TG; Godtliebsen F
Skin Res Technol; 2010 Nov; 16(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 20923456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
