These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20923783)

  • 21. Identification of context-dependent motifs by contrasting ChIP binding data.
    Mason MJ; Plath K; Zhou Q
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Nov; 26(22):2826-32. PubMed ID: 20870645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. T-KDE: a method for genome-wide identification of constitutive protein binding sites from multiple ChIP-seq data sets.
    Li Y; Umbach DM; Li L
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15():27. PubMed ID: 24428924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improved linking of motifs to their TFs using domain information.
    Baumgarten N; Schmidt F; Schulz MH
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1655-1662. PubMed ID: 31742324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Monte Carlo-based framework enhances the discovery and interpretation of regulatory sequence motifs.
    Seitzer P; Wilbanks EG; Larsen DJ; Facciotti MT
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Nov; 13():317. PubMed ID: 23181585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A complete workflow for the analysis of full-size ChIP-seq (and similar) data sets using peak-motifs.
    Thomas-Chollier M; Darbo E; Herrmann C; Defrance M; Thieffry D; van Helden J
    Nat Protoc; 2012 Jul; 7(8):1551-68. PubMed ID: 22836136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. ScerTF: a comprehensive database of benchmarked position weight matrices for Saccharomyces species.
    Spivak AT; Stormo GD
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Jan; 40(Database issue):D162-8. PubMed ID: 22140105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A subspace method for the detection of transcription factor binding sites.
    Pairó E; Maynou J; Marco S; Perera A
    Bioinformatics; 2012 May; 28(10):1328-35. PubMed ID: 22467907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accurate inference of transcription factor binding from DNA sequence and chromatin accessibility data.
    Pique-Regi R; Degner JF; Pai AA; Gaffney DJ; Gilad Y; Pritchard JK
    Genome Res; 2011 Mar; 21(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 21106904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and multiplex sequencing (ChIP-Seq) to identify global transcription factor binding sites in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Brdlik CM; Niu W; Snyder M
    Methods Enzymol; 2014; 539():89-111. PubMed ID: 24581441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A highly efficient and effective motif discovery method for ChIP-seq/ChIP-chip data using positional information.
    Ma X; Kulkarni A; Zhang Z; Xuan Z; Serfling R; Zhang MQ
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Apr; 40(7):e50. PubMed ID: 22228832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Statistics of protein-DNA binding and the total number of binding sites for a transcription factor in the mammalian genome.
    Kuznetsov VA; Singh O; Jenjaroenpun P
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Feb; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 20158869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Role of chromatin and transcriptional co-regulators in mediating p63-genome interactions in keratinocytes.
    Sethi I; Sinha S; Buck MJ
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Nov; 15(1):1042. PubMed ID: 25433490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Learning position weight matrices from sequence and expression data.
    Chen X; Guo L; Fan Z; Jiang T
    Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2007; 6():249-60. PubMed ID: 17951829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.
    Gordân R; Hartemink AJ; Bulyk ML
    Genome Res; 2009 Nov; 19(11):2090-100. PubMed ID: 19652015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. TFmotifView: a webserver for the visualization of transcription factor motifs in genomic regions.
    Leporcq C; Spill Y; Balaramane D; Toussaint C; Weber M; Bardet AF
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Jul; 48(W1):W208-W217. PubMed ID: 32324215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Inferring intra-motif dependencies of DNA binding sites from ChIP-seq data.
    Eggeling R; Roos T; Myllymäki P; Grosse I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():375. PubMed ID: 26552868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. DISPARE: DIScriminative PAttern REfinement for Position Weight Matrices.
    da Piedade I; Tang MH; Elemento O
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Nov; 10():388. PubMed ID: 19941641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. W-AlignACE: an improved Gibbs sampling algorithm based on more accurate position weight matrices learned from sequence and gene expression/ChIP-chip data.
    Chen X; Guo L; Fan Z; Jiang T
    Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(9):1121-8. PubMed ID: 18325926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. MOCCS: Clarifying DNA-binding motif ambiguity using ChIP-Seq data.
    Ozaki H; Iwasaki W
    Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Aug; 63():62-72. PubMed ID: 26971251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An integrated approach to identifying cis-regulatory modules in the human genome.
    Won KJ; Agarwal S; Shen L; Shoemaker R; Ren B; Wang W
    PLoS One; 2009; 4(5):e5501. PubMed ID: 19434238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.