177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20924341)
1. A new device to measure upper limb circumferences: validity and reliability.
Devoogdt N; Lemkens H; Geraerts I; Van Nuland I; Flour M; Coremans T; Christiaens MR; Van Kampen M
Int Angiol; 2010 Oct; 29(5):401-7. PubMed ID: 20924341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema.
Meijer RS; Rietman JS; Geertzen JH; Bosmans JC; Dijkstra PU
Lymphology; 2004 Sep; 37(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 15560108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.
Deltombe T; Jamart J; Recloux S; Legrand C; Vandenbroeck N; Theys S; Hanson P
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17539462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema--comparison of physical measurement methods and self-report.
Czerniec SA; Ward LC; Refshauge KM; Beith J; Lee MJ; York S; Kilbreath SL
Cancer Invest; 2010 Jan; 28(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19916749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema.
Taylor R; Jayasinghe UW; Koelmeyer L; Ung O; Boyages J
Phys Ther; 2006 Feb; 86(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 16445334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissection for breast cancer.
Megens AM; Harris SR; Kim-Sing C; McKenzie DC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Dec; 82(12):1639-44. PubMed ID: 11733875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and reliability of three-dimensional imaging for measuring the volume of the arm.
Erends M; van der Aa T; de Grzymala AP; van der Hulst R
Lymphat Res Biol; 2014 Dec; 12(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 25495383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema.
Ridner SH; Montgomery LD; Hepworth JT; Stewart BR; Armer JM
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17539463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Limb volume measurement: from the past methods to optoelectronic technologies, bioimpedance analysis and laser based devices.
Cavezzi A; Schingale F; Elio C
Int Angiol; 2010 Oct; 29(5):392-4. PubMed ID: 20924339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: A new gold standard for arm volume measurements.
Damstra RJ; Glazenburg EJ; Hop WC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 16752072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation among bioimpedance analysis, sonographic and circumferential measurement in assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema.
Choi YH; Seo KS
Lymphology; 2014 Sep; 47(3):123-33. PubMed ID: 25420305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of the Inverse Water Volumetry Method to Measure the Volume of the Upper Limb.
Beek MA; te Slaa A; van der Laan L; Mulder PG; Rutten HJ; Voogd AC; Luiten EJ; Gobardhan PD
Lymphat Res Biol; 2015 Jun; 13(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 26091408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative comparison between the laser scanner three-dimensional method and the circumferential method for evaluation of arm volume in patients with lymphedema.
Cau N; Galli M; Cimolin V; Grossi A; Battarin I; Puleo G; Balzarini A; Caraceni A
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2018 Jan; 6(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 29248110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of an optoelectronic limb volumeter (Perometer).
Stanton AW; Northfield JW; Holroyd B; Mortimer PS; Levick JR
Lymphology; 1997 Jun; 30(2):77-97. PubMed ID: 9215977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity for the simplified water displacement instrument to measure arm lymphedema as a result of breast cancer surgery.
Sagen A; Kåresen R; Skaane P; Risberg MA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 May; 90(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 19406300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between bioelectrical spectroscopy and perometry in assessment of upper extremity swelling.
Jain MS; Danoff JV; Paul SM
Lymphology; 2010 Jun; 43(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 20848996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a Novel Water-Based Volumetric Device for Measuring Upper Limb Lymphedema: First Experience with Healthy Volunteers.
Wolfs JAGN; Bijkerk E; Schols RM; Keuter XHA; van der Hulst RRWJ; Qiu SS
Lymphat Res Biol; 2019 Aug; 17(4):434-439. PubMed ID: 30653398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A clinically useful method for evaluating lymphedema.
Brown J
Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2004 Feb; 8(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 14983761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Self-measurement of upper extremity volume in women post-breast cancer: reliability and validity study.
Mori T; Lustman A; Katz-Leurer M
Physiother Theory Pract; 2015 May; 31(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 25539094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A simple and innovative device to measure arm volume at home for patients with lymphedema after breast cancer.
Lette J
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(34):5434-40. PubMed ID: 17135645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
