184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20924646)
1. The distribution of visual field defects per quadrant in standard automated perimetry as compared to frequency doubling technology perimetry.
Zein WM; Bashshur ZF; Jaafar RF; Noureddin BN
Int Ophthalmol; 2010 Dec; 30(6):683-9. PubMed ID: 20924646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
Bayer AU; Erb C
Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage.
Soliman MA; de Jong LA; Ismaeil AA; van den Berg TJ; de Smet MD
Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar; 109(3):444-54. PubMed ID: 11874745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of frequency-doubling technology for perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss.
Fan X; Wu LL; Ma ZZ; Xiao GG; Liu F
Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1530-7, 1537.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20466428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in non-arteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy with altitudinal defects.
Girkin CA; McGwin G; DeLeon-Ortega J
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Oct; 88(10):1274-9. PubMed ID: 15377550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual Field Tests for Glaucoma Patients With Initial Macular Damage: Comparison Between Frequency-doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Using 24-2 or 10-2 Visual Fields.
Park HL; Lee J; Park CK
J Glaucoma; 2018 Jul; 27(7):627-634. PubMed ID: 29750715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retinal nerve fiber layer damage as assessed by optical coherence tomography in eyes with a visual field defect detected by frequency doubling technology perimetry but not by standard automated perimetry.
Kim TW; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Sample PA; Shah N; Weinreb RN
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1053-7. PubMed ID: 17239441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of visual field defects on standard automated perimetry by screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry.
Kamantigue ME; Joson PJ; Chen PP
J Glaucoma; 2006 Feb; 15(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 16378016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frequency doubling perimetry in patients with mild and moderate pituitary tumor-associated visual field defects detected by conventional perimetry.
Monteiro ML; Moura FC; Cunha LP
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 17589707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usefulness of frequency doubling technology perimetry 24-2 in glaucoma with parafoveal scotoma.
Jung KI; Kim EK; Park CK
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jun; 96(24):e6855. PubMed ID: 28614218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of Macular Ganglion Cell Complex Thickness With Frequency-doubling Technology Perimetry in Open-angle Glaucoma With Hemifield Defects.
Hayashi K; Araie M; Konno S; Tomidokoro A
J Glaucoma; 2016 May; 25(5):426-32. PubMed ID: 26035420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of optic neuropathy in glaucomatous eyes with normal standard visual fields using a test battery of short-wavelength automated perimetry and pattern electroretinography.
Bayer AU; Maag KP; Erb C
Ophthalmology; 2002 Jul; 109(7):1350-61. PubMed ID: 12093662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
Murata H; Tomidokoro A; Matsuo H; Tomita G; Araie M
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of matrix frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in monitoring the development of visual field defects for glaucoma suspect eyes.
Hu R; Wang C; Racette L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0178079. PubMed ID: 28542536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of Functional Change in Preperimetric and Perimetric Glaucoma Using 10-2 Matrix Perimetry.
Jung KI; Park CK
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 182():35-44. PubMed ID: 28734817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frequency doubling technology for earlier detection of functional damage in standard automated perimetry-normal hemifield in glaucoma with low-to-normal pressure.
Nakagawa S; Murata H; Saito H; Nakahara H; Mataki N; Tomidokoro A; Iwase A; Araie M
J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan; 21(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 21543995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma.
Kim SA; Park CK; Park HL
Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):10173. PubMed ID: 35715424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
