110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20924861)
1. The influence of implant number and abutment design on the biomechanical behaviour of bone for an implant-supported fixed prosthesis: a finite element study in the upper anterior region.
Hasan I; Bourauel C; Keilig L; Reimann S; Heinemann F
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 Dec; 14(12):1113-6. PubMed ID: 20924861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finite element investigation of implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis in the premaxilla in immediately loaded and osseointegrated states.
Hasan I; Heinemann F; Reimann S; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 Nov; 14(11):979-85. PubMed ID: 20665293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone-implant interface with simulated insertion stress around an immediately loaded dental implant in the anterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lee JS; Cho IH; Kim YS; Heo SJ; Kwon HB; Lim YJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 22442767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of the rigidity of a provisional restoration supported on four immediately loaded implants in the edentulous maxilla on biomechanical bone-implant interactions under simulated bruxism conditions: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Yamaguchi K; Ishiura Y; Tanaka S; Baba K
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):442-50. PubMed ID: 25191887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite-element analysis of stress on dental implant prosthesis.
Rubo JH; Capello Souza EA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 19220846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis.
Pierrisnard L; Hure G; Barquins M; Chappard D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 12074450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of arch shape and implant position on stress distribution around implants supporting fixed full-arch prosthesis in edentulous maxilla.
Sagat G; Yalcin S; Gultekin BA; Mijiritsky E
Implant Dent; 2010 Dec; 19(6):498-508. PubMed ID: 21119354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical study of a prosthetic solution based on an angled abutment: case of upper lateral incisor.
Dubois G; Daas M; Bonnet AS; Lipinski P
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Nov; 29(9):989-98. PubMed ID: 17158084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factorial analysis of variables influencing mechanical characteristics of a single tooth implant placed in the maxilla using finite element analysis and the statistics-based Taguchi method.
Lin CL; Chang SH; Chang WJ; Kuo YC
Eur J Oral Sci; 2007 Oct; 115(5):408-16. PubMed ID: 17850430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
