These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20924909)

  • 1. The use of anatomical dolls as a demonstration aid in child sexual abuse interviews: a study of forensic interviewers' perceptions.
    Hlavka HR; Olinger SD; Lashley JL
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Sep; 19(5):519-53. PubMed ID: 20924909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Allegations of sexual abuse of a child: what to do when a single forensic interview isn't enough.
    Faller KC; Cordisco-Steele L; Nelson-Gardell D
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Sep; 19(5):572-89. PubMed ID: 20924911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forensic, cultural, and systems issues in child sexual abuse cases--part 1: an introduction.
    Tishelman AC; Geffner R
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Sep; 19(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 20924907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Setting course: the case for the credentialing of forensic interviewers.
    Haney M; Vieth VI; Campos HM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Nov; 19(6):709-27. PubMed ID: 21113836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developmental differences in the function and use of anatomical dolls during interviews with alleged sexual abuse victims.
    Thierry KL; Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Pipe ME
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2005 Dec; 73(6):1125-34. PubMed ID: 16392985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forensic, cultural, and systems issues in child sexual abuse cases--part 2: research and practitioner issues.
    Tishelman AC; Geffner R
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Nov; 19(6):609-17. PubMed ID: 21113831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Criminal investigations of child abuse: the research behind "best practices".
    Jones LM; Cross TP; Walsh WA; Simone M
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2005 Jul; 6(3):254-68. PubMed ID: 16237158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomical dolls: their use in assessment of children who may have been sexually abused.
    Faller KC
    J Child Sex Abus; 2005; 14(3):1-21. PubMed ID: 16203692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The clinical-forensic dichotomy in sexual abuse evaluations: moving toward an integrative model.
    Tishelman AC; Meyer SK; Haney P; McLeod SK
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Sep; 19(5):590-608. PubMed ID: 20924912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of interviewer race and child race on sexual abuse disclosures in forensic interviews.
    Springman RE; Wherry JN; Notaro PC
    J Child Sex Abus; 2006; 15(3):99-116. PubMed ID: 16893821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Child sexual abuse suspicions: treatment considerations during investigation.
    Kuehnle K; Connell M
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Sep; 19(5):554-71. PubMed ID: 20924910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Child forensic interviewing in Children's Advocacy Centers: empirical data on a practice model.
    Cross TP; Jones LM; Walsh WA; Simone M; Kolko D
    Child Abuse Negl; 2007 Oct; 31(10):1031-52. PubMed ID: 17996298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of interviewers' supportive comments and children's reluctance to cooperate during sexual abuse disclosure.
    Lewy J; Cyr M; Dion J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2015 May; 43():112-22. PubMed ID: 25816755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Children's disclosures of sexual abuse: learning from direct inquiry.
    Schaeffer P; Leventhal JM; Asnes AG
    Child Abuse Negl; 2011 May; 35(5):343-52. PubMed ID: 21620161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls.
    Lamb ME; Hershkowitz I; Sternberg KJ; Boat B; Everson MD
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1251-9. PubMed ID: 8985616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of Repeated Questioning on Interviewers: Learning From a Forensic Interview Training Project.
    Duron JF; Cheung M
    J Child Sex Abus; 2016; 25(4):347-62. PubMed ID: 27266533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A call for field-relevant research about child forensic interviewing for child protection.
    Olafson E
    J Child Sex Abus; 2012; 21(1):109-29. PubMed ID: 22339427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Searching for Truth: The Forensic Interviewer's Use of an Assessment Approach While Conducting Child Sexual Abuse Interviews.
    Duron JF
    J Child Sex Abus; 2020; 29(2):183-204. PubMed ID: 29932818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamics of forensic interviews with suspected abuse victims who do not disclose abuse.
    Hershkowitz I; Orbach Y; Lamb ME; Sternberg KJ; Horowitz D
    Child Abuse Negl; 2006 Jul; 30(7):753-69. PubMed ID: 16846642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of the medical provider in the evaluation of sexually abused children and adolescents.
    Newton AW; Vandeven AM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Nov; 19(6):669-86. PubMed ID: 21113834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.