These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20924986)

  • 1. The influence of goal-state access cost on planning during problem solving.
    Waldron SM; Patrick J; Duggan GB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):485-503. PubMed ID: 20924986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Paying the price works: increasing goal-state access cost improves problem solving and mitigates the effect of interruption.
    Morgan PL; Patrick J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):160-78. PubMed ID: 22928975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving memory after interruption: exploiting soft constraints and manipulating information access cost.
    Morgan PL; Patrick J; Waldron SM; King SL; Patrick T
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):291-306. PubMed ID: 20025416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of operator implementation cost on planfulness of problem solving and learning.
    O'Hara KP; Payne SJ
    Cogn Psychol; 1998 Feb; 35(1):34-70. PubMed ID: 9520317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Tower of London: a study of the effect of problem structure on planning.
    Newman SD; Pittman G
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2007 Apr; 29(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 17454353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reviewing the impact of problem structure on planning: a software tool for analyzing tower tasks.
    Kaller CP; Rahm B; Köstering L; Unterrainer JM
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 216(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 20723568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of problem structure on planning: insights from the Tower of London task.
    Kaller CP; Unterrainer JM; Rahm B; Halsband U
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 20(3):462-72. PubMed ID: 15268923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using another's gaze as an explicit aid to insight problem solving.
    Litchfield D; Ball LJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):649-56. PubMed ID: 21347990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the effectiveness of an interruption lag by inducing a memory-based strategy.
    Morgan PL; Patrick J; Tiley L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Jan; 142(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 23261418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strategy selection and use during classification skill acquisition.
    Bourne LE; Raymond WD; Healy AF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):500-14. PubMed ID: 20192545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tower of Hanoi: evidence for the cost of goal retrieval.
    Anderson JR; Douglass S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Nov; 27(6):1331-46. PubMed ID: 11713870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].
    Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A
    Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of frontal lobe lesions on goal achievement in the water jug task.
    Colvin MK; Dunbar K; Grafman J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Nov; 13(8):1129-47. PubMed ID: 11784450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of incidental hints when problems are suspended before, during, or after an impasse.
    Moss J; Kotovsky K; Cagan J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):140-8. PubMed ID: 20854010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Planning in Parkinson's disease: a matter of problem structure?
    McKinlay A; Kaller CP; Grace RC; Dalrymple-Alford JC; Anderson TJ; Fink J; Roger D
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(1):384-9. PubMed ID: 17928014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The problem state: a cognitive bottleneck in multitasking.
    Borst JP; Taatgen NA; van Rijn H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):363-82. PubMed ID: 20192536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interruption of the Tower of London task: support for a goal-activation approach.
    Hodgetts HM; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):103-15. PubMed ID: 16478319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Goal specificity effects on hypothesis testing in problem solving.
    Burns BD; Vollmeyer R
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):241-61. PubMed ID: 11873850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Planning abilities and the Tower of London: is this task measuring a discrete cognitive function?
    Unterrainer JM; Rahm B; Kaller CP; Leonhart R; Quiske K; Hoppe-Seyler K; Meier C; Müller C; Halsband U
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2004 Sep; 26(6):846-56. PubMed ID: 15370380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Involvement of the prefrontal cortex in problem solving.
    Mushiake H; Sakamoto K; Saito N; Inui T; Aihara K; Tanji J
    Int Rev Neurobiol; 2009; 85():1-11. PubMed ID: 19607957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.