These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20925310)

  • 21. Women's rights in Stalinist Hungary: the abortion trials of 1952-53.
    Peto A; Kossuth E
    Hung Stud Rev; 2002; 29(1-2):49-76. PubMed ID: 17233136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The African Women's Protocol: bringing attention to reproductive rights and the MDGs.
    Gerntholtz L; Gibbs A; Willan S
    PLoS Med; 2011 Apr; 8(4):e1000429. PubMed ID: 21483715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution.
    Tweedt DE
    Temple Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. AMWA position statement on abortion and reproductive rights.
    Devi G; Glodowski M; Shin E
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Mar; 18(3):299-300. PubMed ID: 19281313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth.
    Robertson JA
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1984 Feb; 5(12):7-66. PubMed ID: 10264856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rethinking radical politics in the context of assisted reproductive technology.
    Parks J
    Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 19076939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An equal protection analysis of United States reproductive health policy: gender, race, age, and class.
    Colker R
    Duke Law J; 1991 Apr; (2):324-64. PubMed ID: 10114913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Criminalization of pregnant substance abusers: a health care perspective.
    Popovits RM
    J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Jun; 24(6):169-81. PubMed ID: 10170728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
    Bertuglia J
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The constitutionality of court imposed contraception as a condition of probation.
    Mubaraki M
    Crim Justice J; 1992; 14(2):385-405. PubMed ID: 16700114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Disputes over frozen preembryos and the "right not to be a parent".
    Pachman TS
    Columbia J Gend Law; 2003; 12(1):128-53. PubMed ID: 16281330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The impact of forensic issues on women's rights.
    Walker LE
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1988; 528():361-72. PubMed ID: 3048167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reducing reproductive rights:spousal consent for abortion and sterilisation.
    Rajalakshmi
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2007; 4(3):102-3. PubMed ID: 18624133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Family planning in Iran.
    Lancet; 2015 Mar; 385(9973):1046. PubMed ID: 25797545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Women and the social rights].
    Giraudon D
    Soins; 1982 Jul; (385-386):69-72. PubMed ID: 6921881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Female genital mutilation or cutting: an updated medico-legal analysis.
    Mathews B; Dallaston E
    Med J Aust; 2020 Oct; 213(7):309-311.e1. PubMed ID: 32924148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Taking the sting out of reporting requirements: reproductive health clinics and the constitutional right to informational privacy.
    Bodger JA
    Duke Law J; 2006 Nov; 56(2):583-609. PubMed ID: 17302004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Surrogacy: a last resort alternative for infertile women or a commodification of women's bodies and children?
    Kerian CL
    Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 12(1):113-66. PubMed ID: 16281339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.