565 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20925533)
1. Impact of dental and zygomatic implants on stress distribution in maxillary defects: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis study.
Korkmaz FM; Korkmaz YT; Yaluğ S; Korkmaz T
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):557-67. PubMed ID: 20925533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical 3-dimensional finite element analysis of obturator protheses retained with zygomatic and dental implants in maxillary defects.
Akay C; Yaluğ S
Med Sci Monit; 2015 Feb; 21():604-11. PubMed ID: 25714086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of metal-ceramic or all-ceramic superstructure materials on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Gomes ÉA; Barão VA; Rocha EP; de Almeida ÉO; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1202-9. PubMed ID: 22167424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dental Versus Zygomatic Implants in the Treatment of Maxillectomy: A Finite Element Analysis.
Leblebicioğlu Kurtuluş İ; Kilic D; Kilic K
J Oral Implantol; 2024 Jun; 50(3):220-230. PubMed ID: 38839068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stress analysis in platform-switching implants: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Júnior JF; de Carvalho PS; de Moraes SL; Noritomi PY
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 20932121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Caglar A; Bal BT; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Ozkan S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 20209191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of zygomatic implants for prosthetic rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla.
Aparicio C; Ouazzani W; Hatano N
Periodontol 2000; 2008; 47():162-71. PubMed ID: 18412580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Passivity versus unilateral angular misfit: evaluation of stress distribution on implant-supported single crowns: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Gomes EA; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Delben JA; Rocha EP; de Sousa EA
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1683-7. PubMed ID: 21119400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of mesiodistal inclination of implants on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Cağlar A; Aydin C; Ozen J; Yilmaz C; Korkmaz T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 16519180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional finite elemental analysis of zygomatic implants in craniofacial structures.
Ujigawa K; Kato Y; Kizu Y; Tonogi M; Yamane GY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):620-5. PubMed ID: 17517497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of alveolar bone support on zygomatic implants: a finite element analysis study.
Freedman M; Ring M; Stassen LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 42(5):671-6. PubMed ID: 23347879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical three-dimensional finite-element analysis of maxillary prostheses with implants. Design of number and position of implants for maxillary prostheses after hemimaxillectomy.
Miyamoto S; Ujigawa K; Kizu Y; Tonogi M; Yamane GY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 39(11):1120-6. PubMed ID: 20627226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element analysis of stability and functional stress with implant-supported maxillary obturator prostheses.
de Sousa AA; Mattos BS
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1578-84. PubMed ID: 25277029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
